USA News – Yellow Vests of Canada

According to Mr. Ronald Radosh of Daily Beast, Steve Bannon informed him on November 12, 2013 that “I’m a Leninist. Leninist wanted to destroy the state, and that’s my goal too…I want to bring everything crashing down…” (1)

It is also reported that “Steve Bannon had portrait of himself as Napoleon”.(2)

As per Vox, Cambridge Analytica was created when Steve Bannon approached Robekah and Robert Mercer. Bannon then became the VP of the Company and used it to “leverage data-driven technology to push the hearts and minds of voters toward his populist vision for America”, especially during the 2016 election.(3)(4)

Bannon’s personal political agenda wouldn’t be accomplished if the Presidential candidate was any one other than #Trump and they eventually successed in the presidential election, but this is how Trump looked like when he knew he won:

Steve Bannon officially left White House on Aug 19, 2017:

https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/898870621584596993

At the same time a Twitter account with a Cat-Face @BenKTallmadge posted this: “Trump sent Bannon to kick the shit out of the ChiComs (China’s Communist Party). Bannon has never really left Trump”. Note that he cc’d to Mischa, the fugitive Billionaire Guo Wengui’s senior henchman.(5)

What was Bannon’s mission: “kicking the shit out of the ChiComs”?

Steve Bannon started to contact the fugitive Billionaire Guo Wengui, asylum seeker and whistle-blower of the CCP. Following President Trump’s announcement of Bannon’s new role at BreitbartNews, Breitbart reported on Sept. 7, 2017 that Guo Wengui, aka 郭文贵, became a bargaining chip for the US in the US-China relationship.(6)(7)

We know from the media that Steve Bannon then teamed up with Kyle Bass, Gen. Spalding, Epoch Times and of course, the fugitive billionaire Guo Wengui to implement his political agenda:

And Bannon started building a close relationship with the billionaire Guo Wengui😦9)

What’s curious is that “Cat-Face” tweeted often to all the henchmen associated with Steve Bannon but not to Bannon himself?

The” Cat-Face” even suggested Trump and Macro Rubio play good cop, bad cop, which is exactly what we observed: America’s position on #Hong Kong issue.

It is interesting to note that the “good cop and bad cop” strategy was employed again on the death of Iranian Major General Qassem Soleimani. The White House at that time stated “we do not seek regime change”.(10)

On the same day, John Bolton tweeted “hope this is the first step to regime change in Tehran”(11) contradicting the position of the White House.

A few days later, on Jan. 11, Secretary Pompeo’s tweet endorsed John Bolton position.(12)

Is “Cat-Face” giving orders to President Trump? Is this the quiet “Deep-State” behind Trump?

https://www.politico.com/story/2019/05/22/steve-bannon-huawei-trade-china-1464607

While Steve Bannon was “passionately” giving public speeches about how he “respects and loves” the Chinese people, the “Cat-Face” tweeted “China’s 1.4B population will get nothing to eat! ”

While we saw Bannon talked a lot about the Hong Kong Protests, the “Cat-Face” was giving instructions to Guo Wengui’s henchman and a HongKonger:

This may all appear co-incidental but it is uncanny how Steve Bannon’s time line matches the “Cat-Face‘s” tweets. Even after Bannon opened the War-Room in order to defend Trump in the impeachment proceedings, Ukraine and Biden became the key words of “Cat-Face’s” tweets:

Although Cambridge Analytica went bankrupt following the media’s report about the scandal, evidence shows that Steve Bannon is still able to manipulate social media to assist his henchmen destroy those deemed as their enemies; Gen. Spalding’s followers increased from 2,376 to 41,600 within 6 months, whereas one of Guo Wengui’s henchmen lost 20K subscribers within a few days after he was labeled as traitor.

Is Steve Bannon behind “Cat-Face” @BenKTallmadge? Is Bannon’s “The Movement”, a far-right populist organization which he founded, also setting up governments and citizens on a global-scale to play “good-cop” “bad cop” in order to stir resentment and turn people against each other?(20)(21)(22) Is he the puppet master behind the Trump administration whose goal is to destroy countries and wage war all over the world?(23) Bannon believes in authoritarian politics as preparation for a massive conflict between East and West.(24) Whether East means the Middle East or China is uncertain? But it could very well mean both!

“He believes that, for the new world order to rise, there must be a massive reckoning. That we will soon reach our climax conflict. In the White House, he has shown that he is willing to advise Trump to enact policies that will disrupt our current order to bring about what he perceives as a necessary new one. He encourages breaking down political and economic alliances and turning away from traditional American principles to cause chaos.”(24)

Friends, Bannon is calling for a revolution; you can’t have a revolution without having conflict and you can’t have a “New World Order” without a revolution! If George Soros is the “political instigator of the left”, then Steve Bannon has earned the title as “political instigator of the right.”

How Dangerous is Steve Bannon’s personal agenda?

Hong Kongers’ strategy for the Hong Kong Protests is called 揽炒 which translates to “mutual destruction” and fits perfectly with Bannon’s “crashing down every thing” plan; anarchy!

Hong Kong has now become a cesspool of mafia-inspired executions and gangland atrocities where dead bodies are found on daily basis.

On Jan. 13, 2020:

A Google search using “Steve Bannon” and “ISIS”, you will find many results such as this: “Steve Bannon has weaponized using ISIS techniques”, “spreading white terrorism, inciting violence”. Which is not surprising. At Breitbart, Mr Bannon cemented his role as a champion of the alt-right, the neo-Nazi anti-globalism movement.(23)

#SteveBannon: Is #murder the vulnerables and use their death as political #propaganda what you learned from #ISIS or the #UnrestrictedWarfare (14)

He also worships #Unrestricted Warfare, the CCP’s military work, as his Bible (15). Unrestricted Warfare literally “warfare beyond bounds” is a book on military strategy written in 1999 by two members of China’s People’s Liberation Army. Its focus is to destroy the United States through a variety of ways such as using International law, economic trade, network sabotage, and terrorism to circumvent the need for direct military action.(25)(26)(27)(28) Lead Chinese scientist Guo Deyin, who has been implicated in the development of the Coronavirus bioweapon at the Whuan Institute of Virology, has proposed to reclaim Taiwan through unrestricted warfare by putting Taiwan in such a situation that it would ask to reunite with China. He even said Taiwan would reunite with China naturally after the death of half of its population.(29) There are no rules with unrestricted warfare and nothing is forbidden, which means we should all be weary of reports coming out of China and its closely aligned ally the WHO!

Why are we exposing the facts found on the Internet?

1. Guo Wengui openly and repeatedly uttered death threat with impunity against all those opposing his plan:

Exhibit #1:

https://twitter.com/TruthMatter6/status/1213952599399026689

Exhibit #2:

https://twitter.com/TruthMatter6/status/1213938885266477062

2. Evidence shows that not only #Steve Bannon but also #Trump endorsed Guo Wengui:

Exhibit #3:

https://twitter.com/TruthMatter6/status/1214064520710311936

Exhibit #4:

3. Guo Wengui’s senior henchmen committed cyber bullying and violated #Twitter’s rules, yet their violations are being covered-up.
4. My twitter account and YouTube channel have been constantly suppressed and financially strangled:

Exhibit #5:

Exhibit #6:

Exhibit #7:

Exhibit #8:

https://twitter.com/TruthMatter6/status/1218216358552522753

.@SecPompeo: We’ve engaged in an economic, a diplomatic, and now a military effort to convince the Iranian regime to behave like a normal nation. With respect to the protesters, you’ve seen President @realDonaldTrump speaking directly to them. We don’t want any Iranian harmed. pic.twitter.com/fLOAYBgm34
— Department of State (@StateDept) January 14, 2020

https://twitter.com/TruthMatter6/status/1211725736295518208

[Original Post] Is Trump Administration Carrying Out Steve Bannon’s Personal Political Agenda?/班农之于川普：成也萧何败也萧何

References:

USA News

Trump Impeachment Whistle-blower Fiona Hill IS A Star Soros Operative

November 27, 2019 Unite The Right

Roger Stone in 2017: “George Soros has penetrated the Trump White House. Soros has planted a mole infiltrating the national security apparatus – a woman named Fiona Hill, who has a Harvard background, has been on the Soros payroll and the payroll of Open Society.” (1)

November 21, 2019, Fiona Hill is testifying at President Trump’s Impeachment “Inquiry”. (2)

Fiona was insistant she was not a globalist, and not connected to Soros, and that attacks on Soros are “anti-semetic”, but here is Fiona’s background…

Fiona Hill is an author at The Globalist, where they have trademarked the slogan “Rethinking Globalism”. (3)

Fiona Hill has been inside Soros’s Open Society Institute (OSI) (NY) since before Nov. 04, 2000… Fiona Hill. (Filed May 10, 2001). NEW DIRECTOR, Appointment of director or secretary, Form 288a, Advisory Board, Open Society Institute, signed Nov. 04, 2000, Institute for War and Peace Reporting (IWPR), Co. No. 2744185. Companies House (UK). (4) (5) (6)

Fiona Hill is a member of the Council of Foreign Relations and sits on the board of the Eurasia Foundation. (7)

Eurasia Foundation is under the Open Society umbrella.(8) One must assume so since in her own handwriting, Fiona Hill claims association to George Soros’ Open Society Institute, as an Advisory Board Member with Central Eurasia Project.

Media Matters (Soros) called Roger Stone’s outing of Fiona Hill as a Soros (OSI) operative a “SMEAR”, however, Stone was right. This is the actual [Soros] Media Matters article. (9)

Remarkably, she was hired to advise OSI while she was still completing her PhD at Harvard in History. (10)

According to her resume Fiona Hill worked for the George Soros Open Society Institute from 2000-2006. (11)

Her PhD thesis chair was Richard Pipes, a notoriously biased Russian history professor who was a speaker at two Bilderberg conferences, was a member of the Council on Foreign Relations, and was a C.I.A. advisor to Bush Sr.

Also remarkably, no Fiona Hill biography discovered so far ever mentions her relationship with George Soros or his political entities. (12)

In addition, Vindman (13) & Fiona Hill (14) are represented by Boies, Schiller & Flexner, the same firm that represents Burisma.

Yes, that Burisma who pays Hunter Biden $83,000 a month for nothing, the same Burisma that was being investigated by the Ukrainian prosecutor that Joe Biden extorted his firing. Small world? There are no coincidences in Washington DC or Ukrainian corruption. You would think that Fiona would not want be associated with the equivalent of a Ukrainian mafia attorney but instead she engages them. (15) (16)

References:

USA News

Trump Opposed to UN’s “New World Order” International Criminal Court

November 12, 2019 Unite The Right

The International Criminal Court has been instrumental in implementing the New World Order. Canada has lead the charge and President Donald Trump wants to stand in the way.

In July 1987, over 200 experts from Australia, Canada, the United Kingdom, New Zealand, other Commonwealth countries, the United States, Europe, and Israel gathered at the Inns of Court in London at the “Society for the Reform of Criminal Law ”(ISRCL) to discuss criminal law reform and the criminal justice system (1). During the London conference, the participants analyzed the possible outcomes of movements for criminal law reform which had developed in their respective countries. They examined the present need for reform, the social context for reform, and how reforms should be accomplished.

At the conclusion of the conference, the participants called for the establishment of an international body to bring together those actively working for the improvement of the criminal law and the administration of criminal justice. A number of the participants took up that challenge and founded the ISRCL in January, 1988 (2). John W. Conroy, a Vancouver lawyer and cannabis rights litigator and activist (3)(4) is listed as director of ISRCL since as early as 1988 (5), and the first members of this society are found in the following links: (6)(7).

The ISRCL is a non-profit charitable association incorporated under the laws of Canada. The founders were of the view that the ISRCL must retain its independence of thought and action from government. Accordingly, ISRCL’s key activities and its member services are primarily funded by an annual membership levy and donations. The ISRCL does, however, solicit financial assistance for specific conferences, seminars, or projects from government departments, agencies, law foundations, and other foundations.

Funding for specific projects has been obtained from The British Council, the Departments of Justice of Canada and New Zealand, The Home Office, the Attorney General’s Department of Australia, the Victoria Law Foundation, the Law Foundation of British Columbia, the Law Foundation of Nova Scotia, and the Canadian International Development Agency (CIDA). The Law Reform Commission of Canada, the Correctional Service of Canada, and the British Columbia Corrections Branch have also provided important material and financial assistance in the past (8).

In February 1991, the ISRCL signed an agreement with Simon Fraser University and the University of British Columbia to establish the International Centre for Criminal Law Reform and Criminal Justice Policy in Vancouver, Canada. The ICCLR was incorporated in 1992 as a society with its own Board of Directors and became an associate of the United Nations. In July 1995, an agreement was signed with the United Nations to formally affiliate the ICCLR as an international institute of the United Nations. The ICCLR supports the activities of the ISRCL, and both support the UN Sustainable Development Goals (9).

The International Centre for Criminal Law Reform (ICCLR) conducts research and policy analysis and provides consultation services relating to the fields of international criminal law. Since 1992, ICCLR has been actively committed to supporting global efforts in the creation of a permanent International Criminal Court (ICC). In 1993, ICCLR organized and sponsored The International Meeting of Experts on the Establishment of an International Criminal Court, with more than seventy leading criminal and international law experts from thirty countries converging on Vancouver. The Government of Canada provided financial support for this project through the Department of Foreign Affairs and International Trade and the Department of Justice (Jean Chretien)(10). Both the ISRCL under John Conroy and the ICCLR were also integral partners in it’s formation (11)(12).

On July 1, 2002, the International Criminal Court (ICC) was created as the first permanent international court capable of enforcing the web of international laws that have been designed over the last 74 years since the birth of the United Nations (13)(14 ). Why is this of importance? A country party to the ICC is obligated to cooperate and to submit their judicial processes to this international criminal court which has external oversight. This has serious implications for sovereignty. The ICC, is a supranational tribunal, and has basically consolidated the legality of the “International Order”. After all, a world government needs a world court. Although it is being downplayed, the adoption of a permanent world court is a significant advance toward a one world government the world has ever witnessed (15).

Under President Donald Trump’s administration, the US Government has stated that it will not cooperate with the ICC and has gone as far as to threaten retaliatory steps against the ICC staff and member countries should this international court investigate US or other allied country citizens (e.g. Israel). In March of 2019, US Secretary of State Michael Pompeo announced that the United States would impose Visa bans on ICC officials involved in the courts’ potential investigation of US citizens for alleged crimes in Afghanistan. In 2018, President Trump addressed the UN General Assembly stating:

The United States will provide no support or recognition to the International Criminal Court (ICC). As far as America is concerned the ICC has no jurisdiction, no legitimacy, and no authority (16).

Canada signed this agreement under the Liberal Jean Chretien government on December 18, 1998. On June 29, 2000, Canada enacted the Crimes Against Humanity and War Crimes Act, becoming the first country in the world to adopt this legislation which was ratified on July 7, 2000. It is obvious that Canada is playing an integral role in the implementation of a New World Order. There is the possibility for ISIS foreign fighters captured in Syria to be tried under the International Criminal Court (ICC), but do nations want to give the ICC such authority thereby setting precedent for future criminal convictions of their own citizens (17)?

References:

Category: USA News

Is Trump Administration Carrying Out Steve Bannon’s Personal Political Agenda?班农之于川普：成也萧何败也萧何

What was Bannon’s mission: “kicking the shit out of the ChiComs”?

How Dangerous is Steve Bannon’s personal agenda?

Why are we exposing the facts found on the Internet?

References:

Trump Impeachment Whistle-blower Fiona Hill IS A Star Soros Operative

Trump Opposed to UN’s “New World Order” International Criminal Court

The International Criminal Court has been instrumental in implementing the New World Order. Canada has lead the charge and President Donald Trump wants to stand in the way.