Officially known as the “Abraham Accords Peace Agreement: Treaty of Peace, Diplomatic Relations and Full Normalization Between the United Arab Emirates and the State of Israel (1),” the agreement was initially a joint statement of Israel, United Arab Emirates (UAE), and the United States that was reached on August 13, 2020. The term also refers to peace agreements between UAE, Israel, and Bahrain that were signed on the White House lawn on September 15, 2020 (2). It was the first time any Arab countries had normalized relationships with Israel since Jordan in 1994. The Abraham Accords seem to be designed with money and business in mind, more than anything else (3)(4). The UAE and Israel were already doing business in areas such as the diamond trade, high-tech industry, and defence, and now it will be easier to expand into the new markets.
Beyond hype, the sectors for collaboration are seemingly endless at the moment, with entrepreneurs on both sides wanting to partner across technology-focused “4.0” industries, all the way through to expanding trade in dates, a most ancient food of the region. While there is considerable excitement, a flurry of cross-border Zoom calls, and a surge in visits from Herzliya to ADGM, the real fulfillment of the Abraham Accord will take many, many years to see its potential realized.
Many have wondered if Donald Trump is a Christian (6)(7), however it has been reported in mainstream media that he secretly mocks Christians (8)(9). It was also revealed in the following video that he may actually be Jewish. It’s interesting to note that if it is true that Trump converted to Judaism in 2017, then he does not worship the true God of Israel, the Father of Jesus Christ (10)(11). In this respect, Muslims also do not worship the same God as Christians (12)(13). If Trump is indeed Jewish, and has clearly done so much for Israel, why do American Jews hate him so much (14)?
According to the following video featuring an Israeli and an apparent Christian, “we are not seeing the tribulation right now. Donald Trump is not the antichrist. The Abraham Accord is likely “laying the foundation, the peace and safety prerequisites for Israel for the Gog and Magog war” of Ezekiel 38 and 39:
The “Temple Coin” and King Cyrus Prophecy
This is not the first time that Trump has been featured on a coin in relation to Israel. In 2018, in order to show their appreciation for officially recognizing Jerusalem as Israel’s capital, “the nascent Sanhedrin, the Mikdash (Temple) Educational Center and the United Temple Movements, prepared it to honor Israel’s 70th anniversary next week (15).” It is not actually legal currency, and some see it as a marketing gimmick to dupe (mainly Christians) into thinking that Zionism is a good thing (16).
It will be interesting to watch how everything continues to evolve in the Middle East after the election. Biden, a proud Zionist, has praised the Abraham Accords and stated that a “A Biden-Harris Administration will build on these steps (17).” While Trump is more popular in Israel than Biden, that does not seem to be the case in the United States (18). At least business partnerships that can flourish under the Abraham Accords will continue to rake in the shekels for all involved.
Update: The Aga Khan’s grip on Alberta has been tightened! Salma Lakhani was just named Alberta’s lieutenant-governor, the first Ismaili in Canadian history to hold that role.
In 2005, the Aga Khan was named a Companion of the Order of Canada, the highest civilian honour, by former Governor General Adrienne Clarkson (1). She described him as having a “special relationship” with Canada, and that he is perhaps the only person in the world to whom everyone listens (2)(3). Clarkson also sits on the board of the Aga Khan’s Global Centre of Pluralism (4).
Former Prime Minister Stephen Harper granted honorary citizenship to the Aga Khan in 2010, making him the fifth person to have received the symbolic gesture (5). Harper lavished praise on the spiritual leader for his “pluralistic” view of the world. In 2014, the Aga Khan made an historical address to Parliament that highlighted Canada’s 30-year relationship with the AKDN (6). Following this address, he signed a Protocol of Understanding with Harper, solidifying his partnership between the federal government and his institutions (7). Throughout all of the prestigious commendations the Aga Khan has received all over the world, there is one topic that is brought up over and over: pluralism.
Pluralism and the New World Order
In 2007, under Harper, Canadians gave $30 Million to Aga Khan for the Global Center for Pluralism, along with a 99 year lease of an historic building that used to house Canada’s war museum (8). The center pays $1 a year in rent and then leases out the building at commercial rates to the Royal Canadian Mint, a Crown corporation! It is located in Canada’s first Dominion Archives building, which was built in 1905 as a symbol of Canada’s heritage and identity (9). Last year, it hosted an event acknowledging that there is rising discontent in Canada due in part to the relentless forcing of Islam upon us (10). Chrystia Freeland spoke at the event, which was called “The Rise of Popular Discontent and What We Can Do.”
Pluralism is “a state of society in which members of diverse ethnic, racial, religious, or social groups maintain and develop their traditional culture or special interest within the confines of a common civilization (11)”. That sounds great but the issue is that the Aga Khan is simply poised to promote and develop his own traditional culture more than other people can promote theirs.
In other words, most people simply don’t have the means to draw such massive crowds and build extravagant buildings to highlight their culture or beliefs. This sounds like a perfect way to actually promote and encourage the growth of one culture, while the others slowly disappear, and the Canadian taxpayer pays for this (12)(13).
Behind the idea of pluralism, it has become easier for the Aga Khan and his globalist friends to spread Islam and their other ideals, since people are still free to practice whatever they want (for the time being) and won’t put up a fight or feel threatened. However, since not everyone can create these huge monuments and buildings, other cultures will likely just fade away and become assimilated. Maybe this is why even the Muslim Brotherhood promotes pluralism (14)(15)! The New World Order the Aga Khan wants is an Islamic global society! How exactly will that work if Islam is not compatible with the west (16)?
While some believe that the title “Aga Khan” was granted in 1818 to the first Aga Khan by the shah of Iran (22), the Aga Khan III said himself that the term was not a title at all, but an “alias” that was given to the Aga Khan I when he was a young man, and now it is used as a hereditary title (23)(24). The “His Highness” title is not hereditary either and was granted to the current Aga Khan by Queen Elizabeth II in 1957 (25). Apparently the “royal” Aga Khan is not a royal at all. So why is he treated as one?
The Aga Khan with Prime Ministers Pierre Trudeau, Justin Trudeau, Brian Mulroney, and Stephen Harper.
Perhaps that question can be answered by looking at the history of the Aga Khan in India with the British Crown. When the Aga Khan I was forced to flee from Iran to India, he was well-received by both the Indian Ismailis and the British (26). Eventually, the Aga Khan III rose to power and further enhanced his relationship with the British in India, during a number of campaigns:
One Ismaili history site claims that during the Aga Khan’s first visit to Europe in 1898, he received very special treatment from Queen Victoria at Windsor Palace (82)(83). He sat at her right side during the banquet and “no ruling prince” from India had ever been treated with such respect and honour. He received the title of Knight Commander of the Indian Empire (K.C.I.E.) and met with future king Edward VII. What is particularly interesting is that the Queen had the Aga Khan sit on the “throne of their pope.” When her consuls asked why, she answered:
You are all wise, prudent and learned, and you know better than I the reason of this. In short, I must tell you that we have never seen our religious leader Jesus Christ, and without doubt, the Aga Khan is our same leader, and considering this, I have made him sit on our Pope’s Throne.
It appears that that the current Aga Khan has continued to nurture the special relationship between his family and the British Royals. They definitely seem to have bonded greatly over their love for racing horses, a tradition that has been passed down over generations of their families (27)(28). Race horses are, after all, the ultimate status symbol.
The Aga Khan claims to be directly related to Muhammad through his cousin and son-in-law, Ali, the first Imam, and Muhammad’s wife Fatima (30)(31). Muhammad is said to have been in the direct line of Ishmael through Ishmael’s second son Kedar or Qedar, father of the Qedarites (32)(33). This is disputed (34)(35).
We do know from the Bible that Ishmael was Abraham’s first-born son and Isaac’s older brother. God chose Isaac to inherit His covenant rather than Ishmael (36). Isaac’s descendants became Israelites and Christians, and Ishmael had 12 sons who would become a “great nation (37).”
The Nizari Ismailis have been historically linked to the “Order of the Assassins”, yet reports vary as far as the details of this affiliation. One author claims that they were among the first Muslim terrorists, and another claims most reports were uninformed (43). Either way, there does not seem to be a lot of evidence of any pluralistic views.
Despite all of the effort to trace the Aga Khan back to Muhammad, some controversy remains about this and the Ismailis in general. Some people claim that the Aga Khan is not related to Muhammad at all, and is instead a product of an illegitimate birth between his mother and her previous husband. She remarried only days after her divorce, and Karim was born about 7 months later (45)(46)(47). He is said to be one-quarter Persian, one-quarter Italian and half English (48).
Another issue seems to be that the Ismailis were converted from Hinduism, which is evidenced by their adherence to reciting devotional poems and hymns called “Ginans.” To an Ismaili, the Ginans are as important as the Quran (49). The Quran actually mentions Hinduism and states that Hindus are part of a group known as the Sabians, which do not follow Abrahamic religion (50). Why are the Ginans still revered more than Allah’s words? One Ginan even apparently calls the Aga Khan an incarnation of the Hindu god Vishnu (51)! Another is said to have predicted research related to the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) (52). This is Islam?
There is a fair amount of criticism and controversy surrounding the Aga Khan’s Ismailis (53)(54). They appear to have some practices aren’t based on the Quran at all, such as how simply catching a glimpse of AK can lead to being transformed into a spiritual being (55). This makes them infidels in the eyes of other Muslims (56). They practice the pillars of Islam in their own unique way (57). The thing is, since the Aga Khan considers himself to be a god, the Quran is not as important as his words.
Another controversial aspect of the Ismailis is that they are extremely rich and powerful around the world, and hold many leadership positions. In Canada, they have been extremely successful and are among Canada’s wealthiest and most prominent people (58)(59). Mossadiq Umedaly, a successful Ismaili in Burnaby, calls his silver Porsche Turbo his primary mosque! Shenaz Ladak, an Ismaili from Brampton, stated in 2010 that Ismailis are “born taken care of (60).” The Aga Khan’s Ismailis always come out on top (61).
Driving past the Ismaili Jamatkhana and Centre on Canada Way, you’d never guess this Burnaby site was designated by the Aga Khan as one of only three “high-profile” jamatkhanas in the world… The structure was largely dug below ground and “hidden deliberately… very much assimilated into the community.” Hidden deliberately. This jamatkhana could be a metaphor for the local Ismaili community, whose low profile belies its tremendous impact on the B.C. economy
It appears that the Aga Khan is disobeying Allah and Muhammad in his endeavors in venture capitalism, insurance, and banking. Usury is forbidden in Islam (62). Allah, in some of the best Quranic passages, was very clear about how charging people interest would lead to “painful punishment” and that they will become “residents of the fire.” Muhammad also said in his last sermon that he abolished usury. It is becoming more and more clear that whatever god the Aga Khan professes to be is not even Allah, or that Allah has changed his mind (63). Could it be a different god? Moloch perhaps? Vishnu? Whatever the pope worships?
World Bank/International Finance Corporation (IFC)
The Aga Khan works closely with the World Bank on a number of initiatives. The Aga Khan Fund for Economic Development (AKFED) has been involved with the World Bank’s International Finance Corporation (IFC) for over 40 years (64). One example that has come from that relationship is India’s Housing Development Finance Corporation (HDFC), a pioneer in that country’s home-loan market (65)(66).
The HDFC owns 30.5% of shares in HDFC Bank, where there have been reports of corruption, deception, high interest rates, and even bribery (67). It also has a presence in banking, life and general insurance, asset management, venture capital, realty, education, deposits, and education loans (68). Their total assets are valued at $93 billion dollars. Yet, the Aga Khan Foundation still needs hundreds of millions of dollars from Canadian taxpayers (69).
Additionally, AKFED runs a number of other banks and insurance companies in many countries (71). One of them is Habib Bank (HBL), Pakistan’s largest bank and the first bank opened in newly-formed Pakistan in 1947 (72)(73). The bank played an important role in mobilizing funds from the Muslim community to finance the All-India Muslim League’s campaign for the establishment of Pakistan. HBL has been embroiled in money laundering scandals for years across multiple countries (13)(74). The bank also allegedly cleared transactions to a cybercriminal wanted by the US Federal Bureau of Investigation and a Chinese weapons manufacturer that was subject to US sanctions (75). It seems that the Aga Khan is a big fan of usury, after all.
In 1978, IFC’s CEO Moeen Qureshi’s wrote what appears to be a letter of recommendation to Robert McNamara, president of the World Bank. In the letter, Qureshi mentions that the AK had participated in the creation of HDFC with IFC backing, along with a tourism project in East Africa. That was just the beginning of a long and prosperous history between the World Bank and the Aga Khan.
If IFC just does it right at the beginning, then points the way for other in the market and gives the right signals, the market in a developing country will take care of the rest.
IFC’s investment officer on the original HDFC transaction, Promodh Molhotra (76)
The letter then goes on to praise how well-connected AK is throughout the world with all of his ties and friendships with the leaders in many countries. Qureshi then urged McNamara to ask for AK’s views on “developments in South Asia and Iran.”
Declassified World Bank document from 1978 praising the Aga Khan and his early World Bank investments (77). It seems he was already well-connected throughout the world, courtesy of his grandfather.
How many of Aga Khan’s “views” have led to the decades of exploitation that the World Bank has thrust upon poverty-stricken communities in South Asia and Iran? How about Myanmar? Five star hotels? The World Bank probably consulted the Aga Khan on development matters in those areas!
1956 – International Finance Corporation (IFC) was launched as the private-sector arm of the World Bank Group (76).
1968 – Robert McNamara became the 5th President of the World Bank (78). He promptly asked Lester B. Pearson, former Prime Minister of Canada, to head a commission which was to be independent of the Bank but would work in close proximity to McNamara.
1969 – Pearson’s commission concluded that “IFC has done some useful work in this area, but it is in a position to do very much more. (76)”
1971 – Heeding Pearson’s call, in 1971 IFC created the Capital Markets Department to help build a wide range of local financial institutions including banks, stock markets, insurance companies, and many others. The work has continued ever since. Today, the financial sector represents the largest industry component of IFC’s $52 billion global investment portfolio.
1977 – The Capital Markers Department led to the Aga Khan’s Housing Development Finance Corporation (HDFC), which was set up with IFC support, to build the housing-finance industry in various countries across Asia, Africa, and Eastern Europe.
It’s been 64 years since the creation of the IFC! Where is this poverty reduction that it was supposed to achieve (79)(80)? How has there been six decades of experience, yet there is still widespread poverty across the world? All they have done is increase third world debt. The “poverty reduction strategies” of the IFC and the World Bank are at the very least ineffective and incompetent, and at worst, deeply corrupt and malicious.
The Aga Khan’s concept of pluralism is nothing more than pacification. While it feels good now, and looks good on paper, it is a means to an end. If we are all united under the flag of Islam, with Jesus Christ, the Son of God stamped out, then things will appear “peaceful.” This is the vision of the Mahdi, which will be explored in part three. Everything is being set into place, with Mughal Canada being shaped before our eyes (81). Considering the Aga Khan and his family have had their hands in every pot for thousands of years, there is still much more to tell.
Please click here for the English Standard Version (ESV) of this article.
Introduction
The purpose of this article is to examine Christianity and Islam in order to shed some light on the beliefs of billions of people. To be fair, this is not going to study the violence that has been committed in the name of religion. Instead, it is necessary to discover the fundamentals of both religions by specifically examining the concept of God in Christianity and in Islam.
There are similarities between Islam and Christianity, such as the belief in one God, the belief in Jesus as the Messiah and His virgin birth, in the prophets, and that a Judgment Day will occur. There are also many differences that are found by comparison of the Scripture. We will see that these differences matter as far as telling us about whom is being worshiped by Christians and by Muslims.
God versus Allah: Why does the difference matter?
Religion is not what decides whether a person is good or evil. Some people are only culturally faithful and are certainly not evil people. Everyone must seek what is right, regardless of whom or what they believe in. It is therefore important to know the difference between good and evil in the deities that are worshiped the world over. Hopefully this will allow us all to better understand each other. We should know where people are coming from before inviting them into our homes.
All throughout our history there have been interlopers trying to masquerade as God in order to steal the hearts and minds of the deceived. This is why examining the Scripture is crucial to help people understand that the differences between God and Allah point to the fact that they don’t behave as the same entity at all. If this is true, then we are actually dealing with opponents who are vying for the hearts of the people. Therefore there is a need to compare the doctrines of who the ultimate deity is personally in order to illuminate similarities and differences.
It is important to note that many people in the Middle East and elsewhere refer to God as Allah. To clarify, this article refers to God as the Father of Jesus. The title “allah” was used in pre-Islamic times as a generic name for a god or leader, similar to how “lord” was used. So if someone uses Allah for God the Father of Jesus, then that would refer to the God of Christianity. Now we must look to the information we get from the religious texts to determine who is God and who is the opponent, Satan.
Satan is the Temporary Ruler of the World
Satan is cast down from heaven whenever he tries to become the Most High.
Quran:
“To Him belongs whatever is in the heavens and whatever is on the earth. His throne extends over the heavens and the earth, and their preservation tries Him not. And He is the Most High, The Most Great.” (Quran 2:255)
Bible:
“How art thou fallen from heaven, O Lucifer, son of the morning! how art thou cut down to the ground, which didst weaken the nations! For thou hast said in thine heart, I will ascend into heaven, I will exalt my throne above the stars of God: I will sit also upon the mount of the congregation, in the sides of the north: I will ascend above the heights of the clouds; I will be like the most High.” (Isaiah 14:12-14)
“And he said unto them, I beheld Satan as lightning fall from heaven.” (Luke 10:18)
“Therefore rejoice, ye heavens, and ye that dwell in them. Woe to the inhabiters of the earth and of the sea! for the devil is come down unto you, having great wrath, because he knoweth that he hath but a short time.” (Revelation 12:12)
The Bible states further that Satan to be the ruler of this world for the time being. This is why the current world contains so much evil. Satan was able to offer the world to Jesus when he tried to tempt Him in the wilderness, and Jesus indicates that the current ruler of the world has no claim on Him.
Bible:
“And the devil, taking him up into an high mountain, shewed unto him all the kingdoms of the world in a moment of time. And the devil said unto him, All this power will I give thee, and the glory of them: for that is delivered unto me; and to whomsoever I will I give it. If thou therefore wilt worship me, all shall be thine.” (Luke 4:5-7)
“In whom the god of this world hath blinded the minds of them which believe not, lest the light of the glorious gospel of Christ, who is the image of God, should shine unto them.” (2 Corinthians 4:4)
“Jesus answered, My kingdom is not of this world: if my kingdom were of this world, then would my servants fight, that I should not be delivered to the Jews: but now is my kingdom not from hence.” (John 18:36)
“Of judgment, because the prince of this world is judged.” (John 16:11)
“Hereby know ye the Spirit of God: Every spirit that confesseth that Jesus Christ is come in the flesh is of God: And every spirit that confesseth not that Jesus Christ is come in the flesh is not of God: and this is that spirit of antichrist, whereof ye have heard that it should come; and even now already is it in the world.” (1 John 4:2-3)
“Hereafter I will not talk much with you: for the prince of this world cometh, and hath nothing in me.” (John 14:30)
“Now is the judgment of this world: now shall the prince of this world be cast out.” (John 12:31)
Like Satan, Allah repeatedly calls himself the ruler or lord of this world.
Quran:
“All praise is due to Allah, Lord of the worlds.” (Quran 1:2)
“Allah is the Lord of the worlds.” (Quran 10:37)
“Say, “Who is Lord of the heavens and earth?” Say, “Allah.” (Quran 13:16)
“And to Allah belongs the dominion of the heavens and the earth and whatever is between them. He creates what He wills, and Allah is over all things competent and to him is the final destination.” (Quran 5:17-18)
We see in our fallen world that Allah is attempting to influence people to turn them away from Jesus. Jesus is the example God sent to teach us how to live in peace and love, and to save us from sin and death. In this respect, we see that Allah is an opponent of God since he presents the example of someone other than Jesus.
Allah’s Worst Enemy on Judgment Day will be Jesus, the King of kings
Hadith:
“Allah’s Apostle said, “The most awful name in Allah’s sight on the Day of Resurrection, will be (that of) a man calling himself Malik Al-Amlak (the King of kings).” (Hadith 73:224)
Bible:
“That thou keep this commandment without spot, unrebukable, until the appearing of our Lord Jesus Christ: Which in his times he shall shew, who is the blessed and only Potentate, the King of kings, and Lord of lords;” (1 Timothy 6:14-15)
“These shall make war with the Lamb, and the Lamb shall overcome them: for he is Lord of lords, and King of kings: and they that are with him are called, and chosen, and faithful.” (Revelation 17:14)
“And the armies which were in heaven followed him upon white horses, clothed in fine linen, white and clean. And out of his mouth goeth a sharp sword, that with it he should smite the nations: and he shall rule them with a rod of iron: and he treadeth the winepress of the fierceness and wrath of Almighty God. And he hath on his vesture and on his thigh a name written, King Of Kings, And Lord Of Lords.” (Revelation 19:14-16)
This is extremely important because it shows that on Judgment Day, Jesus, the King of kings, will be Allah’s greatest enemy.
Satan, the Greatest Deceiver
God does not lie and does not encourage lying:
Bible:
“And also the Strength of Israel will not lie nor repent: for he is not a man, that he should repent.” (1 Samuel 15:29)
“And now, O Lord God, thou art that God, and thy words be true, and thou hast promised this goodness unto thy servant:” (2 Samuel 7:28)
“Thy word is true from the beginning: and every one of thy righteous judgments endureth for ever.” (Psalm 119:160)
“In hope of eternal life, which God, that cannot lie, promised before the world began;” (Titus 1:2)
“That by two immutable things, in which it was impossible for God to lie, we might have a strong consolation, who have fled for refuge to lay hold upon the hope set before us:” (Hebrews 6:18)
“And the Word was made flesh, and dwelt among us, (and we beheld his glory, the glory as of the only begotten of the Father,) full of grace and truth.” (John 1:14)
“Sanctify them through thy truth: thy word is truth.” (John 17:17)
Jesus called Satan the father of lies in John 8:44. He was the original liar in the Garden of Eden in Genesis 3:4, and is described by Paul as masquerading as an angel of light (2 Corinthians 11:14). It is also revealed in Revelation 12:9 that Satan is the deceiver of the whole world.
Similarly, we see that Allah calls himself the greatest of all deceivers and followers are permitted and even encouraged to lie. This is known as “Taqiya”.
Quran:
“Allah is the greatest of all deceivers.” – (Quran 3:54, 8:30)
“Then did they feel secure from the plan of Allah? But no one feels secure from the plan of Allah except the losing people.” (Quran 7:99)
“Whoever disbelieves in Allah after his belief… except for one who is forced [to renounce his religion] while his heart is secure in faith. But those who [willingly]open their breasts to disbelief, upon them is wrath from Allah, and for them is a great punishment;” (Quran 16:106)
“Allah does not impose blame upon you for what is unintentional in your oaths, but He imposes blame upon you for what your hearts have earned. And Allah is Forgiving and Forbearing.” (Quran 2:225)
“Narrated Um Kulthum bint Uqba: That she heard Allah’s Apostle saying, “He who makes peace between the people by inventing good information or saying good things, is not a liar.” (Sahih Bukhari 49:857)
“if I tell you something between me and you (not a Hadith) then it was indeed a trick (i.e., I may say things just to cheat my enemy).” (Sahih Bukhari 84:64)
“A liar is not one who tries to bring reconciliation amongst people and speaks good (in order to avert dispute), or he conveys good. Ibn Shihab said he did not hear that exemption was granted in anything what the people speak as lie but in three cases: in battle, for bringing reconciliation amongst persons and the narration of the words of the husband to his wife, and the narration of the words of a wife to her husband (in a twisted form in order to bring reconciliation between them).” (Sahih Muslim 32:6303)
Additionally, there are sections in Sharia Law that instruct people to lie in many circumstances, such as to manifest the standards of Islam, to settle disagreements, to gain sympathy, or if the truth is damaging to Islam. This is information taken directly from Reliance of the Traveler, which is a handbook for Sharia Law.
Now we see what happens to the greatest of all deceivers:
Bible:
“And the great dragon was cast out, that old serpent, called the Devil, and Satan, which deceiveth the whole world: he was cast out into the earth, and his angels were cast out with him.” (Revelation 12:9)
“And the devil that deceived them was cast into the lake of fire and brimstone, where the beast and the false prophet are, and shall be tormented day and night for ever and ever.” (Revelation 20:10)
Conclusion
As we can see when we read the quotes from the Scriptures, God and Allah have different personalities. If Satan is the current ruler of the world, and Allah indicates that he is the current ruler, we must be dealing with the same entity. Jesus said he is not of this world. Also, if Allah is so accepting of deception, and God does not lie, then we are dealing with two different personalities. Therefore, it makes sense to conclude that the God of the Bible and the god of the Quran are not the same deity. Furthermore, the similarities between Allah and Satan lead us to conclude that they are the same being.
Background
This article was written after a document was found at a church outlining Muslim beliefs that was created by the local Islamic Society. The first point on the first page stated that Allah is the same god that Christians and Jews worship. It was astounding to find this in what was supposed to be a house of Christ!
Allah cannot be the same god that Christians worship, since Jesus is the only way to the true, ever-living God. Research led to a plethora of books, articles, debates, and websites about the topic. It became necessary to study the Quran, hadiths, and other Islamic documents like Reliance of the Traveler and compare them to the Bible. This led to the conclusions outlined above. The truth becomes even clearer when one also compares Jesus and Mohammad.
“Jesus saith unto him, I am the way, the truth, and the life: no man cometh unto the Father, but by me.” (John 14:6)
It is extremely important to note that this article is not about hatred for Muslims. It is about love for Muslims and hatred for Satan, who has them shackled. It is about helping to lead people to establish a personal relationship with the living God who will cherish them and forgive them for every mistake upon repentance. It is about not living in fear of death or hell. Every single person who accepts and abides in Jesus Christ as our Saviour and the Son of God will have life everlasting. Jesus is waiting with His hand outstretched to bring peace, joy, and rest to every soul that seeks Him.
The Aga Khan Foundation Canada (AKF) was created in 1980 with almost twenty percent of its revenue coming from Canadian taxpayers to benefit countries in Asia and Africa . It is an agency of the Aga Khan Development Network (AKDN). Just over the last nine years, the AKF has received over $472 million from Global Affairs Canada, the Canadian International Development Agency (CIDA), and Foreign Affairs and International Trade Canada (2). For the period including this year, as the economy collapses around us, the AKF received over $31 million! And how much more has the Aga Khan received from Canadians that has not been reported since the Ismailis were resettled here by Pierre Trudeau in 1972 (100)?
The sad reality is that most of this money will be used to enrich the lives of Ismailis over other people, build Mughal architecture around the world, promote Islam, fund lavish lifestyles and horse racing, and even support a fake god on Earth (3)(4)(5)(99)(101). In 1975, the Aga Khan declared himself to be “the living god” and “the spokesman for almighty Allah,” a concept endorsed by his followers and supporters (6)! But who exactly is this “god” and why is he treated like royalty?
Despite millions in funding, like the Clinton Foundation, the Aga Khan Foundation’s global impact is still considered low per dollar spent (7). Between 2012 and 2015, the Government of Canada changed how it designates foreign charities (8)(9)(10). In 2014, it had whittled the list down to zero, and has since added only four charities, the AKF being one of them (11). The Clinton Foundation lost its status with the new changes. It is interesting to note that the AKF is the only charity that has been on the list since the reporting began! There’s even another relating to his museum.
Being on the list of registered foreign charities means the charity can issue donation receipts and registered charities can make gifts to it, allowing for tax breaks for the donors (12). This can also mean that the status can result in lack of transparency, and that only the most powerful charities achieve this status (8). Could this make it even easier for the AKF to engage in money laundering activities as the Clinton Foundation has been accused of (13)?
The Aga Khan’s Money Laundering Network
In 2015, Aga Khan Foundation Canada spearheaded a report outlining funding strategies to meet financial goals required to implement the United Nations Agenda 2030 (14). They called for a broad partnership between governments, agencies, foundations, and corporations to determine a detailed costing for the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) in order to meet global health challenges over the next 15 years. The report “Innovative Financing Mechanisms for Health” included the World Health Organization (WHO), The Global Alliance for Vaccines and Immunizations (GAVI), and UNITAID (which consists of George Soros, Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, and the Clinton Global Health Initiatives (15)). Why is the Aga Khan Foundation acting like a “Finance Minister” for the the United Nations? Why were they taking a leading role?
The report addressed a $25 -75 billion shortfall for healthcare and potential sources for acquiring more funds for Agenda 2030. It highlights a 2013 Report of “High-Level Panel of Eminent Persons” on the Post-2015 Agenda. The Panel was part of the Secretary-General’s post-2015 initiative to advance the development framework for all SDGs, including healthcare beyond 2015, and advocates for more “private financing” from the Globalists themselves (16)!
These are the people and organizations that are planning and implementing your fate during this “plandemic” while fulfilling Agenda 2030 requirements! This is exactly what we are witnessing now with the onset of “public-private-partnerships”(PPPs), initiatives whose ultimate goal is to replace sovereign governments with a New World Order; all planned, orchestrated and implemented by the United Nations and triggered by the pandemic (18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23)!
These corporations hide under a veil of fake philanthropy, which involves the manipulation of tax laws while exploiting nations and their citizens in an elaborate money laundering network (24)(25)(26). The Aga Khan, Bill Gates, Trudeau, Soros, the Clintons, Frank Giustra and many others rely on philanthropy to fill their coffers while the media portrays them as heroes. The Aga Khan is the “Kingpin” of this operation and the United Nations is his throne!
A recent C.D. Howe Institute report, titled “Why We Fail to Catch Money Launderers 99.9% of the Time” estimates money laundering in Canada is at $100 billion to $130 billion. This is because Canada’s weak money laundering laws make it easy for launderers to avoid detection and prosecution, and their assets are protected from arbitrary confiscation (27):
Unfortunately, Canada’s anti-money-laundering laws are among the weakest of Western liberal democracies. We not only don’t have a public registry of beneficial ownership; we generally don’t require any beneficial ownership disclosure whatsoever.
In 2015, the Clinton Foundation (USA) refused to disclose the identities of 1,100 donors, most of whom were not U.S. citizens (28)(29). The donations were routed through the Clinton Giustra Enterprise Partnership (Canada), a Canadian charitable organization. That organization then effectively bundled the foreign donations and sent them along to the Clinton Foundation and it did all of this without ever disclosing the individual foreign sources of the income, thereby bypassing US tax laws (30). At the time, Bill Clinton had helped Frank Giustra’s company secure a lucrative uranium-mining deal in Kazakhstan and in return received “a flow of cash” to the Clinton Giustra Enterprise Partnership totaling $2.35 million (31).
We found similar patterns with the Aga Khan Foundation. In 2011, the Toronto Star reported Aga Khan Foundation for “lack of transparency” as a charity because it refused to release audited financial statements to the public and to an independent agency that evaluates charities (32). An internet search revealed that the Aga Khan Foundation (Canada) was receiving funds and then those funds were transferred to the Aga Khan Foundation (Geneva). Are these elaborate money-laundering networks? How many other networks similar to this are running globally? Is Canada a money laundering conduit for the Aga Khan Foundation? Governments should be demanding full transparency from these foundations, but then again how many are complicit?
The monies collected by Aga Khan Foundation are distinct from those collected within the Ismaili Centers around the world from members of the community which are also cited for lack of transparency. A 2005 Bloomberg report indicated that unlike the pope, who was paid a salary of $51.7 million in 2004, the Aga Khan refuses to disclose how much he or the AKDN raise each year from their followers nor how it is allocated. And he won’t give performance figures for the Aga Khan Fund for Economic Development SA, a Geneva-based holding company that owns stakes in 90 companies. All profits and dividends from the companies and projects are reinvested, he says. In addition to money from his Ismaili followers, the Aga Khan obtains bank loans and grants from western governments and aid organizations to finance his empire (34). All in the name of Islam!
The Aga Khans have a long history of money laundering and extortion. In 1901, three Aga Khan Sheikhs were arrested & charged with murder, attempted murder, violence, and extortion while collecting money for the Aga Khan (35). (Zakat is a form of alms-giving treated in Islam as a religious obligation or tax.)
In 1989, the FBI arrested 13 Aga Khan Ismailis on charges of illegal money laundering with networks stretching from Canada, USA, London, Switzerland, and Belgium. This was one of the largest money laundering operation ever uncovered in the USA. The Aga Khan also moved his divorce proceedings from France to the UK in order to avoid disclosing his assets and net worth (36). It was also in France that former Prime Minister Sarkozy exonerated the Aga Khan from paying taxes, saving him billions of dollars (37).
In 1991 Police intercepted over $100 Million USD being smuggled for the Aga Khan from Canada and the United States to his Swiss Bank Accounts in Geneva!
Habib Bank
Habib Bank, Pakistan’s largest bank, is currently under investigation for money laundering and financing terrorism (103). The bank is owned by the Aga Khan Fund for Economic Development with assets over $20.1 billion (38). In September 2017, HBL agreed to pay a fine of $225 million in an out of court settlement with the New York State Department of Financial Services (DFS) against 53 separate violations allegedly committed between 2007 and 2017 (104).
What role does the United Nations play in this web of corruption? The Aga Khan III was appointed President of the League of Nations in 1937 (39). The League was dissolved during WWII and plans began in 1944 to create the United Nations (40). In 1945, the United Nations Organization was born, and it inherited the Palais des Nations and all of the other assets from the League (41). In 1966, the organization became the United Nations Office at Geneva. Just a year later, The Aga Khan Development Network was formed by both the Aga Khan III and the current Aga Khan IV, and which has been described as their “own UN” (42). Members of the Aga Khan family were then placed in various roles within the United Nations (43).
If you examine the AKDN “umbrella network” you will see that it is financed through key governmental agencies that fund global humanitarian aid and development (i.e. CIDA, IDRC, USAID, AFD, BMZ, DFID, SIDA, ECHO, etc.) along with central UN partners (i.e. WHO, UNICEF, UNDP, UNFPA) (44). The Aga Khan Foundation, for example, is a preferred non-profit partner of CIDA (Canadian International Development Agency) and the IDRC (International Development Research Center). Coincidentally, CIDA was founded at the same time the AKDN was established with Maurice Strong, the father of the “Green Movement,” as its first president (45)(46)(47). Are these are the very same agencies that have been implicated in funding coups in many countries, and that work collectively with the CIA to both destabilize and control the governmental workings of nations and their people, and the very same agencies run by globalists to implement Agenda 2030?
It appears quite suspicious, even more so when we find out that the United Nations Office of Drugs and Crime has partnered with Aga Khan Foundation to help fight money laundering and the financing of terrorism (49). Is the United Nations the Aga Khan’s cartel? Sure looks like it! In the 1960s, U.S. Attorney Robert Kennedy and FBI Director Edgar J. Hoover stepped up government efforts to fight organized crime and corruption (50). Did the Aga Khan Network, along with their globalist despots, reorganize to become legit in the public eye?
United Nations Agenda 2030: Depopulation and the Club of Rome
For close to 60 years, the Aga Khan has been involved in international projects through the Aga Khan Development Network (51)(52)(53). Much of this came about through the relationships developed with Liberal Prime Ministers Lester B. Pearson (102), Pierre Elliot Trudeau, and the father of the “Green Movement” Maurice Strong. Lester Pearson was instrumental in establishing the United Nations, NATO, and the United Nations Emergency Force. Pearson is said to be responsible for the transformation of Canadian society into a United Nations microcosm (54)(55)(56). These are all key players of the Desmarais family’s long-arm of corruption(57)(58)(59)!
Aga Khan family members have also played prominent roles within the United Nations. The Aga Khan’s uncle Prince Sadruddin Aga Khan served as High Commissioner for Refugees from 1966 to 1977(60)(61) and established the Bellerive Foundation for Primary and Renewable Energy in 1977, a private non-profit organization registered in Switzerland that promotes environmental activism through high-level government lobbying (62)(63). He was also one of the founders of the “world environmental movement” and Greenpeace, and has published several papers with Maurice Strong (64)(65)(66).
To keep it all within “La famiglia,” Bellerive Foundation merged with the Aga Khan Foundation in 2006 (67). The Aga Khan’s aunt, Princess Catherine Aga Khan founded Earth Focus Foundation, which promotes sustainable development and environmental activism education worldwide (68). Some global patrons include: Maurice Strong, Prince Sadruddin Aga Khan, Vaclav Harvel, Sir Edmund Hillary, and the Dalai Lama (69).
The Aga Khan has a long history with the Trudeau Family. In written submissions to the Ethics Commissioner investigating the “Aga Khan Island” vacation taken by Justin Trudeau, the Aga Khan stated that he first developed a friendship with the Right Honourable Pierre Elliott Trudeau, Justin Trudeau’s father, in the late 1960s. Pierre Trudeau became Prime Minister of Canada in April 1968. The Aga Khan wrote that a personal relationship and friendship developed between them and that they met socially and vacationed together along with their families. The Aga Khan indicated that their friendship continued over the years. They exchanged written correspondence and would meet when the Aga Khan visited Canada. Sometimes, the Aga Khan would stay at the Prime Minister’s residence with Pierre Trudeau and his family (71).
Famiglia! Members of the AKDN with Pierre E. Trudeau, who was responsible for implementing pluralism in Canada (72)(73).
Pierre Trudeau and the Aga Khan’s uncle Prince Sadruddin Aga Khan were also members of the Club of Rome, a global think tank whose mission is global depopulation (74)(75).
Founded in 1968 (a popular year!), it describes itself as “a group of world citizens, sharing a common concern for the future of humanity.” The Club of Rome is an environmental think tank that believes global population growth far exceeds the global supply of food and water (76). It is the apex of the New World Order “Pyramid” consisting of current and former heads of state, high-level politicians and government officials, diplomats, scientists, economists, and business leaders from around the globe (77).
The Club of Rome founded two sister organizations, the Club of Budapest and the Club of Madrid. All three of these “clubs” share many common members and hold joint meetings and conferences. These are three heads of the same beast, all promoting the “Green Movement” that is permeating in every segment of our society, but whose true agenda is to foster fear and control (78)(77)(79). In order to facilitate the agenda of the New World Order, the Club of Rome calls for the elimination of most of the world’s population through war, disease, abortion, famine, and any other means necessary (78).
On Sept 24, 2019, the Club of Rome issued a statement at the United Nations proposing that nations declare a Planetary Emergency for Climate & Nature in 2020. The Planetary Emergency Plan calls for an immediate Climate Action and Global Economic Transformation (80).
Members of the Club of Rome include: George Soros, Henry Kissinger, Al Gore, Bill Clinton, Maurice Strong, David Rockefeller, Mikhail Gorbachev and the “Vaccine King” himself, Bill gates (77)!
The financial backers behind the Club of Rome are the insurance cartels in Switzerland and Italy. One of the main in-house economist to the Club of Rome, Orio Giarini, was the secretary-general of the Geneva-based International Association of Insurance Company Economists, a program set up by the Geneva Association with the aim of “encouraging research and economic analysis of uncertainty and insurance (81)(82).” This association includes executives of almost 50 private insurance companies (83)(84).
In October 1983, Giarini forward that “the past 10,000 years of the Neolithic age: characterized, by production of capital, are over,” and that the world was entering the age of the “service economy,” in which “risk and uncertainty” would be the predominant paradigm for nations and societies. Giarini asserted that “insurers and priests” would be the chief arbiters of social planning.
What does this mean? Insurance companies no longer want to make payouts to those they scammed trillions from with expensive premiums. The elderly, the handicapped, and the sick have very little chance of survival with “social planning.” If one thing holds true, the Globalists never change their pattern of destruction. During WWll, Allianz, a major insurance company, created and enforced “termination and refusal policies” for the payout of life insurance claims made by Jewish families and beneficiary payments went directly to the Nazis instead (86). Oh wait what’s this? Allianz has a seat on the board of directors of the Geneva Association!
The Sadruddin Aga Khan was one of the chief bank-rollers of the policies devised by the insurance cartel. Together with Giarini and Denis de Rougemont (a gnostic-satanist), he established an organization named Ecoropa in 1976, which became the central organization of the European Environmentalist Movement (88)(89).
De Rougemont praised eco-terrorists Longo Mai of France, an anti-capitalist group who regarded global food shortages and political upheavals as being the prototype for the future of the “Green Movement (89)(90)(91)”. This group believes in splitting European nation-states into small ethnic enclaves and bringing an end to modem industrial civilization (89). We believe that they are currently using the COVID-19 Pandemic to implement this exact plan globally; “Multiculturalism” was a myth and “Pluralism” is a lie!
Agenda 2030: Club of Rome designed a Master Plan for the NWO
According to the Club of Rome, a “Master Plan” was developed in 2009. The planet will be divided into 10 kingdoms or regions where the global population will be between 500 million and 1 billion (92):
1. North America – food production, natural resources, and mid-tech manufacturing; 2. Western Europe – financial services and high-tech manufacturing; 3. Japan – fisheries, mid and high-tech manufacturing; 4. South Africa Australia New Zealand – developed market; 5. Eastern Europe – financial services and high-tech manufacturing; 6. Latin America – food production natural resources 7. North Africa & Middle East – natural resources; 8. Main Africa – natural resources 9. South Asia – low-tech manufacturing; 10. China – low-tech manufacturing,
This “Master Plan” was submitted to the United Nations Parliamentary Assembly UNPA in 2008. A global research program coordinated through a convening group of ten persons based in ten world regions established the ten kingdoms of the “new” global economy. The group received funding from the Ford Foundation. The Building Global Democracy (BGD) Programme consisted of academic researchers, civil society activists, entrepreneurs, journalists and officials (93). BGD’s administrative office is located in the Centre for the Study of Globalization and Regionalization at the University of Warwick in the United Kingdom. In November 2008, findings of the program’s pilot project on Civil Society and Accountable Global Governance were presented at the United Nations in New York (94).
Justin Trudeau was a signatory to the UNPA in 2010 (95). He was never serving Canada’s best interests; he was always a puppet of the New World Order (96)(97)!
We have come full circle; Pierre Trudeau was the brains behind the UNPA and Justin Trudeau gave Canada away to it! Daddy must be so proud!
The Aga Khan is the spiritual leader of the Ismaili sect but his stewardship remains highly questionable. Born a “Stateless Monarch” the Aga Khan has now found his kingdom: the United Nations. And we are now his unwilling subjects. What is pluralism? How does this tie into the New World Order agenda? How will Islam be involved? Is the Aga Khan the Antichrist? Find out soon in part two of this series! Same bat-time, same bat-channel!
Please click here for the King James Version (KJV) of this article.
Introduction
The purpose of this article is to examine Christianity and Islam in order to shed some light on the beliefs of billions of people. To be fair, this is not going to study the violence that has been committed in the name of religion. Instead, it is necessary to discover the fundamentals of both religions by specifically examining the concept of God in Christianity and in Islam.
There are similarities between Islam and Christianity, such as the belief in one God, the belief in Jesus as the Messiah and His virgin birth, in the prophets, and that a Judgment Day will occur. There are also many differences that are found by comparison of the Scripture. We will see that these differences matter as far as telling us about whom is being worshiped by Christians and by Muslims.
God versus Allah: Why does the difference matter?
Religion is not what decides whether a person is good or evil. Some people are only culturally faithful and are certainly not evil people. Everyone must seek what is right, regardless of whom or what they believe in. It is therefore important to know the difference between good and evil in the deities that are worshiped the world over. Hopefully this will allow us all to better understand each other. We should know where people are coming from before inviting them into our homes.
All throughout our history there have been interlopers trying to masquerade as God in order to steal the hearts and minds of the deceived. This is why examining the Scripture is crucial to help people understand that the differences between God and Allah point to the fact that they don’t behave as the same entity at all. If this is true, then we are actually dealing with opponents who are vying for the hearts of the people. Therefore there is a need to compare the doctrines of who the ultimate deity is personally in order to illuminate similarities and differences.
It is important to note that many people in the Middle East and elsewhere refer to God as Allah. To clarify, this article refers to God as the Father of Jesus. The title “allah” was used in pre-Islamic times as a generic name for a god or leader, similar to how “lord” was used. So if someone uses Allah for God the Father of Jesus, then that would refer to the God of Christianity. Now we must look to the information we get from the religious texts to determine who is God and who is the opponent, Satan.
Please note that the Bible quotations used are from the English Standard Version. The King James Version quotes can be found at the bottom of this article.
Satan is the Temporary Ruler of the World
Satan is cast down from heaven whenever he tries to become the Most High.
Quran:
“To Him belongs whatever is in the heavens and whatever is on the earth. His throne extends over the heavens and the earth, and their preservation tries Him not. And He is the Most High, The Most Great.” (Quran 2:255)
Bible:
“How you are fallen from heaven, O Day Star, son of Dawn! How you are cut down to the ground, you who laid the nations low! You said in your heart, ‘I will ascend to heaven; above the stars of God I will set my throne on high; I will sit on the mount of assembly in the far reaches of the north; I will ascend above the heights of the clouds; I will make myself like the Most High.” (Isaiah 14:12-14)
“Jesus said, ‘I saw Satan fall like lightning from heaven.’” (Luke 10:18)
“Therefore, rejoice, O heavens and you who dwell in them! But woe to you, O earth and sea, for the devil has come down to you in great wrath, because he knows that his time is short!” (Revelation 12:12)
The Bible states further that Satan to be the ruler of this world for the time being. This is why the current world contains so much evil. Satan was able to offer the world to Jesus when he tried to tempt Him in the wilderness, and Jesus indicates that the current ruler of the world has no claim on Him.
Bible:
“And the Devil, leading Him up into a high mountain, showed Him all the kingdoms of the world in a moment of time. And the Devil said to Him, “All this power I will give you, and the glory of them; for it has been delivered to me. And I give it to whomever I will. Therefore if you will worship me, all shall be yours.” (Luke 4:5 –7)
“And in their case the god of this world has blinded the minds of the unbelievers, to keep them from seeing the light of the gospel of the glory of Christ, who is the image of God.” (2 Corinthians 4:4)
“Jesus answered, “My kingdom is not of this world. If my kingdom were of this world, my servants would have been fighting, that I might not be delivered over to the Jews. But my kingdom is not from the world.” (John 18:36)
“The ruler of this world is judged.” (John 16:11)
“By this you know the Spirit of God: every spirit that confesses that Jesus Christ has come in the flesh is from God, and every spirit that does not confess Jesus is not from God. This is the spirit of the antichrist, which you heard was coming and now is in the world already.” (1 John 4:2-3)
“I will no longer talk much with you, for the ruler of this world is coming. He has no claim on me,” (John 14:30)
“Now is the judgment of this world; now will the ruler of this world be cast out.” (John 12:31)
Like Satan, Allah repeatedly calls himself the ruler or lord of this world.
Quran:
“All praise is due to Allah, Lord of the worlds.” (Quran 1:2)
“Allah is the Lord of the worlds.” (Quran 10:37)
“Say, “Who is Lord of the heavens and earth?” Say, “Allah.” (Quran 13:16)
“And to Allah belongs the dominion of the heavens and the earth and whatever is between them. He creates what He wills, and Allah is over all things competent and to him is the final destination.” (Quran 5:17-18)
We see in our fallen world that Allah is attempting to influence people to turn them away from Jesus. Jesus is the example God sent to teach us how to live in peace and love, and to save us from sin and death. In this respect, we see that Allah is an opponent of God since he presents the example of someone other than Jesus.
Allah’s Worst Enemy on Judgment Day will be Jesus, the King of kings
Hadith:
“Allah’s Apostle said, “The most awful name in Allah’s sight on the Day of Resurrection, will be (that of) a man calling himself Malik Al-Amlak (the King of kings).” (Hadith 73:224)
Bible:
“Keep the commandment unstained and free from reproach until the appearing of our Lord Jesus Christ, which he will display at the proper time—he who is the blessed and only Sovereign, the King of kings and Lord of lords.” (1 Timothy 6:14-15)
“They will make war on the Lamb, and the Lamb will conquer them, for he is Lord of lords and King of kings, and those with him are called and chosen and faithful.” (Revelation 17:14)
“And the armies of heaven, arrayed in fine linen, white and pure, were following him on white horses. From his mouth comes a sharp sword with which to strike down the nations, and he will rule them with a rod of iron. He will tread the winepress of the fury of the wrath of God the Almighty. 16 On his robe and on his thigh he has a name written, King of kings and Lord of lords.” (Revelation 19:14-16)
This is extremely important because it shows that on Judgment Day, Jesus will be Allah’s greatest enemy.
Satan, the Greatest Deceiver
God does not lie and does not encourage lying.
Bible:
“And also the Glory of Israel will not lie or have regret, for he is not a man, that he should have regret.” (1 Samuel 15:29)
“And now, O Lord God, you are God, and your words are true, and you have promised this good thing to your servant.” (2 Samuel 7:28)
“The sum of your word is truth, and every one of your righteous rules endures forever.” (Psalm 119:160)
“In hope of eternal life, which God, who never lies, promised before the ages began.” (Titus 1:2)
“So that by two unchangeable things, in which it is impossible for God to lie.” (Hebrews 6:18)
“And the Word became flesh and dwelt among us, and we have seen his glory, glory as of the only Son from the Father, full of grace and truth.” (John 1:14)
“Sanctify them in the truth; your word is truth.” (John 17:17)
Jesus called Satan the father of lies in John 8:44. He was the original liar in the Garden of Eden in Genesis 3:4, and is described by Paul as masquerading as an angel of light (2 Corinthians 11:14). It is also revealed in Revelation 12:9 that Satan is the deceiver of the whole world.
Similarly, we see that Allah calls himself the greatest of all deceivers and followers are permitted and even encouraged to lie. This is known as “Taqiya”.
Quran:
“Allah is the greatest of all deceivers.” – (Qur’an 3:54, 8:30)
“Then did they feel secure from the plan of Allah? But no one feels secure from the plan of Allah except the losing people.” (Qur’an 7:99)
“Whoever disbelieves in Allah after his belief… except for one who is forced [to renounce his religion] while his heart is secure in faith. But those who [willingly]open their breasts to disbelief, upon them is wrath from Allah, and for them is a great punishment;” (Qur’an 16:106)
“Allah does not impose blame upon you for what is unintentional in your oaths, but He imposes blame upon you for what your hearts have earned. And Allah is Forgiving and Forbearing.” (Qur’an 2:225)
“Narrated Um Kulthum bint Uqba: That she heard Allah’s Apostle saying, “He who makes peace between the people by inventing good information or saying good things, is not a liar.” (Sahih Bukhari 49:857)
“if I tell you something between me and you (not a Hadith) then it was indeed a trick (i.e., I may say things just to cheat my enemy).” Sahih Bukhari 84:64)
“A liar is not one who tries to bring reconciliation amongst people and speaks good (in order to avert dispute), or he conveys good. Ibn Shihab said he did not hear that exemption was granted in anything what the people speak as lie but in three cases: in battle, for bringing reconciliation amongst persons and the narration of the words of the husband to his wife, and the narration of the words of a wife to her husband (in a twisted form in order to bring reconciliation between them).” (Sahih Muslim 32:6303)
Additionally, there are sections in Sharia Law that instruct people to lie in many circumstances, such as to manifest the standards of Islam, to settle disagreements, to gain sympathy, or if the truth is damaging to Islam. This is information taken directly from Reliance of the Traveler, which is a handbook for Sharia Law.
Now we see what happens to the greatest of all deceivers:
Bible:
“And the great dragon was thrown down, that ancient serpent, who is called the devil and Satan, the deceiver of the whole world—he was thrown down to the earth, and his angels were thrown down with him.” (Revelation 12:9)
“…and the devil who had deceived them was thrown into the lake of fire and sulfur where the beast and the false prophet were, and they will be tormented day and night forever and ever.” (Revelation 20:10)
Conclusion
As we can see when we read the quotes from the Scriptures, God and Allah have different personalities. If Satan is the current ruler of the world, and Allah indicates that he is the current ruler, we must be dealing with the same entity. Jesus said he is not of this world. Also, if Allah is so accepting of deception, and God does not lie, then we are dealing with two different personalities. Therefore, it makes sense to conclude that the God of the Bible and the god of the Quran are not the same deity. Furthermore, the similarities between Allah and Satan lead us to conclude that they are the same being.
Background
This article was written after a document was found at a church outlining Muslim beliefs that was created by the local Islamic Society. The first point on the first page stated that Allah is the same god that Christians and Jews worship. It was astounding to find this in what was supposed to be a house of Christ!
Allah cannot be the same god that Christians worship, since Jesus is the only way to the true, ever-living God. Research led to a plethora of books, articles, debates, and websites about the topic. It became necessary to study the Quran, hadiths, and other Islamic documents like Reliance of the Traveler and compare them to the Bible. This led to the conclusions outlined above. The truth becomes even clearer when one also compares Jesus and Muhammad.
“Jesus said to him, “I am the way, and the truth, and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me.” (John 14:6)
It is extremely important to note that this article is not about hatred for Muslims. It is about love for Muslims and hatred for Satan, who has them shackled. It is about helping to lead people to establish a personal relationship with the living God who will cherish them and forgive them for every mistake upon repentance. It is about not living in fear of death or hell. Every single person who accepts and abides in Jesus Christ as our Saviour and the Son of God will have life everlasting. Jesus is waiting with His hand outstretched to bring peace, joy, and rest to every soul that seeks Him.
In 2008, a memo about the Aga Khan III that had been sealed for 60 years was finally released (1). The memo was received by the British government from a Nazi agent after the war ended, when everything was seized and people were forced to confess. The 1942 memo states that in a prior meeting with Hitler, the Aga Khan pledged “to raise an army of 30,000 Arab troops to back a German occupation of Egypt, Syria and Palestine.” The memo about his grandfather’s dealings with Hitler was of course declared “baseless” by the current Aga Khan (2).
Nonetheless, it was reported around the world that the Aga Khan visited with Hitler at his secluded retreat on October 20, 1937 (3), followed by British royals two days later (4). At this point in time, Hitler had become openly aggressive towards the League of Nations, and suddenly its president was being hosted as a “special guest” at Hitler’s private resort. By then, most of the League members had openly abandoned the covenant and new territory was being charted (5).
According to the article above, the League of Nations was created in 1919 right after WW1 ended. The members had witnessed the suffering of many people during the war, and honestly seemed to have the right heart at the beginning. Their goals were to pursue peacekeeping efforts centered around discussion and disarmament. There were several disagreements in the world that the League helped to resolve peacefully. However, in the lead-up to WW2, the group found itself having less and less control of global affairs. This is when everyone began to abandon the failing League and further arm their nations.
The Aga Khan wasn’t the only Muslim leader who had met with Hitler. In November of 1941, after the war had been raging on for two years, Hitler met with the leader of the Palestinian people, the Grand Mufti of Jerusalem, Haj Amin al-Husseini. The Mufti very much wanted to assist in the effort to wage war against the Jews (6). When he met with Hitler, the two devised a plan for what would happen if Germany were to win the war. The Führer laid out his next steps for the war, speaking openly about what needed to happen before he would publicly declare the Mufti as his ally.
First, Hitler was planning on destroying the Judeo-Communist empire in Europe. Next, he wanted German forces to reach the southern exit from Caucasia. Once those conditions were met, one of his next goals would be to declare the Mufti the leader for addressing the “Jewish Question” in Palestine. The Mufti did have an impact on Nazi Germany’s “Arabic language propaganda” aimed at North Africa and the Middle East during World War II (7). He also had a special relationship with the Aga Khan, given his support for the All-India Muslim League (8).
Known simply as the Muslim League, the All-India Muslim League was a political party in British India that was founded in 1906 partly by the Aga Khan, who also became its first president (9). The Muslim League strongly advocated for the establishment of a Muslim nation-state in India. This successfully led to the partition of British India in 1947 and the creation of Pakistan, the only country in the world to have been created completely in the name of Islam (10). This move was resisted not only by the British themselves, but also by Mahatma Gandhi. Gandhi was bewildered by the prospect of dividing India and he repeatedly insisted that India’s Muslims and Hindus could co-exist (11). However, once it seemed impossible to avoid a partition, he famously fasted and visited conflicting areas, attempting to make the process peaceful (12). The main point here is that while the Aga Khan was pushing for united nations as president of the League of Nations, he was also pushing for dividing a nation with the Muslim League.
The division of India along religious lines did not happen peacefully (13), and the battle rages on even today in disputed areas, such as Kashmir (14). When the Muslim League was first created as a political party, the Indian government attempted to accommodate them. They added seats in congress that were only to be used by members of the Muslim League, and one of the first steps was a dispute about the number of seats. For his part, Aga Khan himself had to step in to convince the League that it was okay to get two less seats in congress in order to continue the plan (15). And since he broke the family’s 1300 year tradition and chose his grandson instead of his son to succeed him, we can be sure that his plan is continuing to play out today (16).
What does this history lesson have to do with Canada?
When the All-India Muslim League was busy converting the people of India to Islam, there were a number of steps that were taken. First, as described above, they founded a political party to gain control of the government. In Canada, we see that the Aga Khan is very actively involved with the Canadian government, and receives millions of dollars in support for various initiatives, most of which are not in Canada (17)(18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23)(24)(25)(26). There is even an added concern here that the money that is given to the Aga Khan primarily focuses on specifically helping his Ismaili communities, as he stated in 2015 (27):
I, as Imam of the Ismailis, have responsibility for and supreme authority over the community. This means taking the lead in the practice of the religion but also engaging in ongoing activities to improve the Ismailis’ quality of life and to help every Ismaili in the world who is in difficulties. It is true that today the role of the Aga Khan, 49th hereditary Imam of the Shia Ismaili Muslims, is to interpret Islam.
What does he mean when he says that his role is to “interpret Islam”? It sounds very much like he can tell his followers whatever he wants! This is why some Muslim groups do not even consider him to be a Muslim (28)(29). Although he denies this, many of his followers actually believe him to be the embodiment of his god (30)(31)! Considering that his son is sometimes referred to as “the son of god” or even jokingly called Jesus (32), the question definitely remains.
Another trait that is criticized by some Muslims is the fact that the Aga Khan, like his grandfather and father, have been known to be “playboys” (33)(34)(35). There is a similar trend in their taste in women: the family seems to prefer beautiful white women who are either royals, models, or Hollywood stars (36)(37)(38)(39). They get converted to Islam and are given new names (40)(41)(42)(43).
The Aga Khan’s 1969 wedding photograph
The Aga Khan has a huge fan in Adrienne Clarkson, Canada’s former Governor-General. There were multiple events she attended to honour him, some of which were also attended by Stephen Harper, Kathleen Wynne, and Toronto mayor John Tory (44). In an article in 2018, she gushed about the Aga Khan’s “special relationship” with Canada (45). Not surprisingly, she appointed him Honorary Companion of the Order of Canada, the highest civilian honour, during her term. She is also a board-member of one of his government-funded Canadian projects, The Global Centre for Pluralism in Ottawa.
Perhaps one of the most interesting comments Clarkson has made about the Aga Khan also proves one of the main points of this article: She “best described the influence of the Aga Khan when suggesting that he is ‘perhaps the only person in the world to whom everyone listens (46)’”. There you have it!
On top of the Aga Khan’s involvement with the Canadian government, there are other Islamic groups attempting to influence our government. One of them is the prospective Islamic Party of Ontario, that claims among other things that Islam is the “native religion of all of Canada” and that Canada should be under Sharia Law (47).
The other group that has “good relations with the government” is the Ahmadiyya Muslim Community. This group is a particular danger for Canada because they “view themselves as leading the propagation and renaissance of Islam”, especially in the Western World (48). In 2014, the group sponsored an event about the Aga Khan called “Islam and Authority in the Global World (49).”
Missionaries such as the Ahmadiyya and Sufi have been pivotal in the conversion of people to Islam. When the last Buddhist empire in India fell, the goal was to establish Muslim empires (50):
The Early Medieval period (642–1219 CE) witnessed the spread of Islam in the region. During this period, Sufi missionaries played a pivotal role in converting a majority of the regional Buddhist and Hindu population to Islam. These developments set the stage for the rule of several successive Muslim empires in the region, including the Ghaznavid Empire (975–1187 CE), the Ghorid Kingdom, and the Delhi Sultanate (1206–1526 CE). The Lodi dynasty, the last of the Delhi Sultanate, was replaced by the Mughal Empire (1526–1857 CE).
This tells us that shortly after Mohammad’s death in 632, Islam began to invade India after Arabia had been conquered (51). It also tells us that all of the empires boiled down to one final successor: the Mughal Empire. One of the first steps that was taken once areas came under the control of the Mughals was to destroy buildings and monuments from other cultures and empires to replace everything with Mughal structures, buildings, and gardens. This was done to make a “statement” about who was in control of the region, as they were “emblems of power and wealth (52).”
Despite the claim that some of the Mughal rulers were tolerant of indigenous religions, it appears that overall, this was not the norm. There exists many accounts of Mughal brutality towards Hindus, Sikhs, Buddhists, and Jainists (53)(54)(55). The extent of the bloodshed and cruelty is beyond what is even imaginable, but the Mughal leaders were so proud of their treatment of their rivals that they nearly recorded everything; many of the sources are from the rulers’ own chroniclers. Along with the usual murder, looting, raping, and slave-taking, there was wide-spread use of torture. For example, there are reports of people being boiled alive in cauldrons or forced to wear their dismembered children as garlands. However, here we are, with politicians and others the world over who are actually praising Mughal architecture and culture, even here in Canada.
Guru Tegh Bahadur’s companions were boiled and sawed alive in front of him when he refused to accept Islam. They are said to have remained calm and steadfast in their faith.
We can gauge how much someone wants to revive this barbaric culture by how much praise is given specifically to Mughal ideas. Do people not understand that these buildings and gardens are symbolic of cultural domination? Or worse, do they actually think that promoting the return of the Mughals is what the world really needs? To find out, it is necessary to investigate what our Canadian leaders are saying specifically about the magnificence of the murderous Mughals. Who praises these ideas the most?
The Taj Mahal and Mughal Architecture
Many Canadian politicians have visited the Taj Mahal, including Stephen Harper (56) and Justin Trudeau (57). This building was built during the “golden years” of the Mughal Empire in honour of a Mughal king’s favourite wife (58). It likely also exists because of the Mughal connection to Hinduism (59)(60). The building is still a sore spot between Indians and Muslims to this day (61)(62). Granted, just visiting the Taj in itself does not necessarily indicate that someone is glorifying the Mughal Empire. However, when a politician takes the extra step of also visiting and honouring Humayun’s Tomb, things get a little more conspicuous. The tomb is a great source of pride for the Aga Khan, since it was the first Mughal garden-tomb built in the Indian subcontinent and something he spent 6 years restoring (63).
When Alberta’s premier Jason Kenney visited Humayun’s Tomb in 2009, he did an interview with an Ismaili news outlet extensively praising it and its symbolism (64). Like many other politicians, Kenney has gone out of his way many other times to praise and honor the Khan throughout the years (65)(66)(67), and made a point to again visit the tomb in September 2018 (68). Between that and his 2009 interview, and his praise for Canada’s new Mughal garden (69)(70), it does not appear that Jason Kenney is on the side of Canadians when it comes to the Aga Khan. This is Kenney’s 2009 quote, suggesting that a revival of Islamic architecture and heritage is a good thing:
When this trip was being planned I asked Alykhan Velshi, my communications director, to see if we could fit in a visit to a place that would highlight some of the work the Aga Khan Development Network (AKDN) has done and continues to do. Humayun’s Tomb is one perfect example of AKDN’s efforts to revive interest in Islamic architecture and heritage and to plan its programs so that a maximum number of people around a particular project can benefit from it.
It seems like Kenney might be an even bigger fan of the K than Adrienne Clarkson! Perhaps Alberta may be in grave danger of becoming the next seat of the Mughal empire. Not only does the premier have a history of revering this barbaric civilization and the Aga Khan himself, but he also credits himself for the drastic influx of refugees into rural Alberta (71). He even reiterated his desire to continue to do so (72)(73). On top of everything, the mayor of Calgary is one of the Aga Khan’s loyal Ismaili subjects, and a huge new mosque was built in Fort McMurray (74)(75)(76). This “multicultural” mosque, the Aga Khan Garden, and pluralism itself are all following the idea of the Aga Khan III: that you must build social capital before attempting to gain full political power (77).
Mughal Magnificence
It is no wonder that there should be concern about the symbolism of these buildings and gardens. Canada is home to one of the newest and most extravagant Islamic gardens in the world (78)(79). The Aga Khan Garden just opened last year on the University of Alberta campus, and was celebrated on Father’s Day, 2019. It has been praised countless times as being a wonderful example of Mughal architecture and culture (80). The other new garden is located in King’s Cross, London, where there even is a “terrace of discovery” featuring a throne that overlooks all of King’s Cross and the entire London skyline (81). The Aga Khan is working on restoring all of the historic Mughal gardens as well (82). These gardens are symbolic of creating an “Islamic paradise” (83):
The Mughals were obsessed with symbol [sic] and incorporated it into their gardens in many ways. The standard Quranic references to paradise were in the architecture, layout, and in the choice of plant life; but more secular references, including numerological and zodiacal significances connected to family history or other cultural significance, were often juxtaposed.
Clearly, the Aga Khan Gardens in Toronto and Alberta, and all of the other structures, buildings, and monuments that are popping up in Canada are here to usher in a new Mughal era. The Aga Khan museum in Toronto even kicked-off 2019 with a celebration called “Mughal Magnificence (84).” It sounds like the perfect timing for that event considering Canada now has two Islamic gardens, the Aga Khan museum, and large Ismaili centres in Toronto and Burnaby, BC (85). We also have the Global Centre for Pluralism in Ottawa, located in Canada’s first Dominion Archives building, which was built in 1905 as a symbol of Canada’s heritage and identity (86). The centre recently hosted an event acknowledging that there is a rise of discontent in Canada due to their relentless forcing of Islam upon us (87). Chrystia Freeland spoke at the event, which was actually called “The Rise of Popular Discontent and What We Can Do.”
Evidence suggests that during the partition of India, the Aga Khan and the Muslim League did not follow the example of anyone tolerant. Lahore, Pakistan, once the capital of the Mughal empire, became one of the most violent cities during the partition of India in 1947 because it was hotly contested by both Indians and Muslims (88). It became the site for both the declaration of Indian independence from the British, and the resolution calling for the creation of Pakistan. Accordingly, it became the capital of Pakistan’s Punjab province upon the completion of the partition. It is hard to believe that other cultures and religions were tolerated and respected when this happened (89)(90):
Prior to the partition of India in 1947, a third of Lahore’s population was Hindu and Sikh. Lahore’s Hindus and Sikhs used to reside in ‘distinct enclaves’. The city’s Hindu and Sikh population left en masse during the partition and shifted to East Punjab and Delhi in India. In the process, Lahore lost its entire Hindu and Sikh population. The emigrants were replaced by Muslim refugees from India. Muslim refugees and locals competed for ownership over abandoned Hindu and Sikh property.
Today, Lahore is 96% Muslim, up from 60% in 1941. When the current Aga Khan is promoting the revival of Mughal culture, he either is following the example of the few Mughal leaders that promoted pacification of indigenous people in order to rule over them (91)(92), or the virtual elimination of them like what happened in Pakistan. Both options would obviously be bad for Canada. Will we see an “All-Canada Muslim League”?
Pakistan – Is this what pluralism looks like?
While K and his politician friends in Canada and the rest of world praise and glorify Mughal architecture and customs, there are tens of millions of people spinning in their graves. Whichever way you look at this, we can be sure that the Aga Khan is more important than Hitler, that the remnants of the Mughal Empire fell into British hands and then were handed directly to the Muslim League in 1947, and that the emphasis on all of the Mughal stuff in Canada and the rest of the world is to re-establish the empire for the last time. How many of our politicians are on board with this?
Rachel Notley – Which fake hijab is your favourite?
In October 2018, Rachel Notley, along with the Aga Khan, University of Alberta, and Lt-Governor of Alberta Lois Mitchell, announced an extravagant project that had been recently completed (1). The project is called the “Garden of Life”, and its purpose is to continue to inject Islam into the fabric of Canada (2).
Built within the University of Alberta Botanic Garden (3), the idea of the garden was first announced in 2009, in a speech the Aga Khan gave at his graduation ceremony, when he received an honorary doctor of law degree (4). He also signed a new “agreement (5)” with the university and announced the creation of the Global Centre of Pluralism in Ottawa (6).
Pluralism
To understand the garden and the Aga Khan himself, it is necessary to know what pluralism is since this is the concept that he promotes the most.
According to Merriam-Webster, pluralism is “a state of society in which members of diverse ethnic, racial, religious, or social groups maintain and develop their traditional culture or special interest within the confines of a common civilization (7)”. That sounds great but the issue is that the Aga Khan is simply poised to promote and develop his own traditional culture more than other people can promote theirs.
In other words, most people simply don’t have the means to draw such massive crowds and build extravagant buildings to highlight their culture or beliefs. This sounds like a perfect way to actually promote and encourage the growth of one culture, while the others slowly disappear. The Aga Khan actually gets Canada to pay (8) for some of these projects, even his projects in other countries (9)!
Behind the idea of pluralism, it has become easier for the Aga Khan and his globalist friends to spread Islam and their other ideals, since people are still free to practice whatever they want and won’t put up a fight or feel threatened. However, since not everyone can create these huge monuments and buildings, other cultures will likely just quietly fade away in comparison. Maybe this is why even the Muslim Brotherhood (10) promotes pluralism (11)!
An article written in 2010 about Brooks, Alberta, sums up what may happen when we have new immigrants who don’t understand Canadian laws (12). It refers to Sudanese immigrants, but I’m sure it can apply to anyone:
The Sudanese community has had its problems because of a lack of understanding of what the law is. They saw the law as something else and they didn’t put themselves in it… (also) cocaine, which has been in the town for years, arrived suddenly in larger quantities and found a ready market among some immigrants.
Higher crime rate and more violent streets “arrived suddenly” at the same time as hundreds of immigrants! It seems that things have not gotten much better in Brooks, with some people now fearing that the city may become Canada’s first “no-go zone (13).”
The Garden
While it may fall under the umbrella of pluralism, the garden really is more like cultural programming (14). Principal architect for the project, Thomas Woltz said (15), “The message of this garden is one, I believe, of pluralism”. For now maybe, but the end goal is world domination (16). It is not surprising that Mohammad himself promoted pluralism, since non-Muslims became “the people of the dhimma” and had to pay a “jizya” tax (17)! We can be sure our regular Canadian taxes will still be in effect too! A dhimmi refers to a non-Muslim subject in conquered Muslim lands (18):
A non-Muslim subject of a state governed according to the shari’a who is granted the freedom to worship and is entitled to the protection of life and property by the state, although constrained to pay a special tax and not granted the full legal status accorded to Muslim subjects. The status of dhimmi was originally limited to Christians and Jews but has occasionally been extended to Hindus, Zoroastrians, and others.
In addition to that, the word is also used disparagingly towards non-Muslims who are acting in a “conciliatory manner.” And because the Aga Khan practices his own concept of Islam to create a “super state (19)”, it is difficult to say exactly what he has planned for his Dhimma. It looks like we may find out soon! Welcome to Dhimmanada!
At the inauguration of the garden on October 16, 2018, the Aga Khan said this about the project (20):
(The) Garden has its roots in very different times and places. The symbol of the Garden as a spiritual symbol goes back to the Holy Qur’an itself—where the Garden ideal is mentioned many times. Down through many centuries, Islamic culture has continued to see the Garden as a very special place, where the Human meets further proof of the Divine.
Speaking of divine, the garden even features “a skyline of rosy-white Portuguese limestone towers, atop an imposing podium of granite and limestone. This is the Talar — the Persian word for ‘throne’ (21) .” Exactly whose divine throne is in that garden? It certainly is not God’s (22)! Even if you’re okay with wandering around the throne of satan, there are other considerations that may come to mind.
First of all, when considering the role of the garden, the Aga Khan spoke of it being a “social space.. a place for learning, for sharing, for romance, for diplomacy, for reflection on the destiny of the human race (23).” This is HIS idea of the destiny of the human race! Have the people embrace Islam in every possible way!
In this disturbing article (24), it is openly admitted that the garden is there to change the culture and society of Canada to presumably turn it into a Muslim culture:
Edmonton joins other cities including Bamako, Cairo, Delhi, Kabul, and Toronto in hosting parks and gardens that were conceived or rehabilitated by the AKTC as catalysts for positive economic, social, and cultural change…
The Mughal Empire and people are emphasized many times in news coverage as far as the inspiration behind that garden and its message (25). Rachel Notley even goes so far as to say that is not just Mughal architecture, but “traditions” as well (26). These traditions prove that pluralism is actually pacification:
The Mughal Empire did not try to intervene in native societies during most of its existence, rather co-opting and pacifying them through conciliatory administrative practices and a syncretic, inclusive ruling elite, leading to more systematic, centralized and uniform rule.
The garden only drastically promotes one type of culture and one type of religion, for the purpose of further spreading the ideas of Islam into the Canadian population. In fact, the addition of the Aga Khan Garden is going to drastically increase the number of people who visit the University of Alberta campus (27). Considering the motto of the garden, that “no one leaves unchanged (28)”, it looks like bacon will be off the shelves in Alberta in no time!
The “Talar”
Rachel Notley and the Aga Khan’s Culture Bomb
On May 10th, 2018, Notley and the Aga Khan met for a discussion about the “Agreement of Cooperation” in place since 2012 between the Government of Alberta and the Ismaili Imamat (29)”. She said that is was a time to “reflect on Alberta’s longstanding relationship with the Ismaili Imamat, and the many values we share, including the importance of cultivating pluralism in a diverse society…”, and by pluralism she means Islam! She also expressed her gratitude and stated that “diversity makes us stronger.” Where have we heard that before?
Rachel Notley and Aga Khan – The view from the “throne”
When Notley said that the garden was influenced by Mughal traditions, did she even understand the meaning of that? Has she seen the above quote about the traditions of the Mughal Empire? Do the rest of the politicians in Canada know what it means? Either they are ignorant or complacent. The Khan and his followers are here to attempt to usher in a new global era!
Rachel Notley and Canada’s Indigenous People
The Aga Khan has a good friend in Rachel Notley (30). She’s not alone as far as being someone involved in his network. After all, it seems hard to resist him. However, one of the first things that Notley and Mitchell mention right away in their speeches is that the land belongs to Treaty 6 Indigenous peoples (31)! What a slap in the face! At the time of truth and reconciliation, let’s drop a huge Islamic garden in their backyard! Kids in Ontario have to learn Ojibwe in school, and meanwhile they are stamping out First Nations in Alberta? There is not even a feather in the K’s garden for them.
There is a tiny Indigenous Garden (32) located within the larger Botanic Garden that was created in 1980. From the look of the pictures, not a thing has been done to the place since! At least the page for the Indigenous Garden includes some berries and most of a plaque about pine trees!
Aga Khan Garden versus the Indigenous Garden
In her first paragraph of her speech at the inauguration of the garden, Notley says:
I’d like to begin by joining President Turpin and Her Honour, by acknowledging that we are all here on the traditional territory of Treaty Six and also to recognize the Métis people of Alberta who share a very deep connection with Islam that we are very, very, effectively celebrating here today.
Is the connection so deep that their culture is barely represented in that garden? Yes, very effective indeed! A spiritual space that has nothing to do with our very spiritual Aboriginal Canadians? They must know that when Islam comes, it will stamp their culture out just like it did in this garden. The blatant lack of respect here is astounding. They both mentioned that they are on Treaty 6 land just to say that they did, then proceeded to insult the people. The following map (33) shows that Islam and even the Japanese are represented more in that garden than our First Nations are. Perhaps this is representative of where the university gets its money from?
Map of the Botanic Garden
Yet, in spite of all of this, Notley was recently awarded a Blackfoot name and headdress at a ceremony in Lethbridge, Alberta (34). She was praised for “accomplishing a lot” and “taking over the government.” The ceremony drew criticism on social media, and Dee Brown is quoted in the article as saying:
Who was consulted about this decision?… I’m pretty sure the general consensus of the population strongly disagrees about honouring a politician who has forsaken so many of our people.
Aksitooskitsiphpaki
Although the organizers of this event likely meant well, there does seem to be a need to educate people about the kind of agreements that are happening in Alberta and the rest of Canada with the Aga Khan. He may seem harmless and many of the things he does actually improve lives. No one is objecting to building new hospitals or ensuring access to clean drinking water. The issue is that the focus is on specifically assisting his Ismaili subjects first, then getting local governments to pay for it (35).
Meanwhile in Canada, the only change that the Khan wants is cultural change. He is not improving life for vulnerable Canadian people. They put a huge Islamic garden full of running water on Treaty 6 territory, while there are 38 short-term drinking water advisories in our First Nations. Six of those communities are in Alberta (36)! So to honour Notley means that you honour our government and you honour the Aga Khan.
Yellow Vests of Canada 