As drug manufacturers speed up their efforts to find a new treatment drug for the coronavirus outbreak that has devastated China and has caused a world-wide panic, a Chinese drug company just announced that it has started mass-producing an experimental drug from Gilead Sciences that has the potential to fight the novel coronavirus (1).
BrightGene Bio-Medical Technology, a Suzhou based company (2), just announced that it has developed the technology to synthesize the active pharmaceutical ingredients of Remdesivir, the drug developed by Gilead Biosciences. Its stock price surged 20% in Tuesday morning trading in Shanghai (1).
“While BrightGene said that it intends to license the drug from Gilead, its move to start manufacturing at this early stage is highly unusual and a potential infringement of the American company’s intellectual property.“(1) This comes a week after Chinese researchers at the Wuhan Institute of Virology filed an application to patent Gilead’s drug Remdesivir to treat the new coronavirus, a bid that would give China leverage over the global use of the therapy to fight the outbreak (1)(3)(4).
The decision to seek a patent instead of invoking a “compulsory license” option that lets nations override drug patents in national emergencies, signals China’s commitment toward intellectual property rights. The timing is uncanny! Right? Gilead will retain the global rights to market the antiviral medication, once approved (3). Gilead has also announced that it is partnering with the Chinese Health Authorities on the clinical trials of Remdesivir as a treatment for coronavirus (5). Remdesivir was originally developed in 2016 by Gilead as a treatment for the Ebola virus (13). Many have argued that China stole the patent from Gilead due to a technicality, but you will soon see that this is indeed not the case (14).
And who exactly is Gilead Biosciences? Gilead is partnered with Wuxi Pharmaceuticals (Wuxi AppTec) owned by New World Order philanthropist and mass manipulator himself, George Soros (6)(7)! Here is a printout of Soros Fund Managaement Portfolio which will confirm this (8)!
Wuxi Pharmaceuticals is conveniently located in the epicenter of the outbreak near Wuhan Institute of Virology that has been implicated as the bioweapons manufacturer of this coronavirus (10)(11)(12)! Does China have both the bioweapon and the therapeutic? And let’s not forget the patent on the treatment drug! How charitable do you suppose China will be with the west?
But this story doesn’t end here. George Soros also owns Gilead Biosciences (15).
According to The Gateway Pundit, doctors at Providence Regional Medical Center successfully treated a coronavirus patient within hours using Gilead’s drug Remdesivir (16). Given the current outbreak that has taken the world by surprise, it’s important to look at all the current players. How is Gilead Biosciences tied to this viral outbreak?
Gilead endorsed and is involved in a drug purchasing group called UNITAID whose mandate is to create a “patent pool” for pharmaceutical companies to share their “drug patents” with other companies in order to produce generic drugs for distribution to poor African nations (17)(18). The royalties from the sales of these generic drugs are then paid to the patent holders (19). UNITAID emerged from the United Nations 2000 Millennium Declaration, which has now evolved into the UN Global Compact (20)(21). Their internet timeline shows that the UNITAID website Unitaid.org is also linked to Refunite.org an agency partnered with the UN Refugee Agency UNHCR that helps to connect refugees with their families using the internet (22)(23)(24)(25)(26).
UNITAID has several financial backers including: WHO, UNAIDS, Global Fund, and the Roll Back Malaria Partnership. In addition, UNITAID has corporate sponsorship from pharmaceuticals with the “Medicines Patent Pool” (28).
One billionaire investor behind UNITAID is George Soros himself (29). But why stop there? UNITAID is also financed by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and also involves a partnership with the Clinton Health Access Initiative (CHAI) (30)(31). And interestingly enough both UNITAID and Gilead Biosciences supported Hillary Clinton for president in 2016 (32)(33).
UNITAID’s objectives are to exclude high and middle-income countries from “drug pool” while allowing “developing” countries to benefit from lower drug prices (35). In 2009 UNITAID’s board voted to exclude China and other more lucrative nations when considering targeted nations outside of Africa. However, since then all that has changed and UNITAID has now included China in its “drug pool” (36).
Minutes of the Executive Board of UNITAID dated December 5-6, 2018 in Marrakesh Morocco (which coincided with the signing of the UN Global Compact on Migration) stated the following (37)(38):
THE REPRESENTATIVE OF WHO informed the Board of a recent meeting coordinated by WHO with several global health partners (GPEI, GFF, Gavi, Unitaid, Global Fund) to support the development of a common health narrative. With regard to parliamentary engagement, he informed of a new Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) between WHO and the Inter-parliamentary Union and encouraged Unitaid to build on this commitment in its country work. He underlined the important role of Board members in supporting the Unitaid Secretariat by opening new doors and leveraging existing political and other connections. He also gave positive feedback on the recent Unitaid-WHO visit to China, which explored opportunities for engagement.
A year later we now have a Global Pandemic emerging from Mainland China and the Chinese are the holders of the patent for the treatment drug and they are also included in the United Nation’s UNITAID initiative that will see them benefit with lower drug pricing. Furthermore Gilead, a main supporter of UNITAID (39), has also announced that it is partnering with the Chinese Health Authorities on the clinical trials of Remdesivir as a treatment for coronavirus (5). And once approved, Gilead will retain the global rights to market the antiviral medication (3).
UNITAID is the UN and this is bio-warfare, where they control the drugs. China did not steal Gilead’s patent; Gilead was a willing participant, they are even working with the Chinese government on clinical trials. The question remains, how will this impact western nations that are excluded from the acquisition of lower-priced treatment drugs? Will our economies be held hostage to Chinese imperialism? And has the coronavirus outbreak been the vehicle for George Soros, Bill Gates, and the United Nations to implement the New World Order? It sure look’s like it! Checkmate!
UPDATE:
Fauci spearheaded the research on Remdesivir! Since 2002 Anthony Fauci has been collaborating with USAMRIID in Fort Detrick where GILEAD developed Remdesivir!
USA taxpayers paid for the Remdesivir Research NOW being gouged by Gilead and…. China! Over a virus China created! FFS… Lock them all up & take over the patent!
What do we have here? The Clinton Group Inc? In Canada with Desmarais ties? Do the CLINTONS have private ownership in Gilead with Soros, Gates & China?
For up to date information on who committed the act of bio-terrorism, please refer to 律政悟空, IForYou
For up to date footage from within China, while you can get it, please refer to Harry Chen PhD
In the earliest case, the patient became ill on 1 December 2019 and had no reported link to the seafood market, the authors report. “No epidemiological link was found between the first patient and later cases,” they state. Their data also show that, in total, 13 of the 41 cases had no link to the marketplace. “That’s a big number, 13, with no link,” says Daniel Lucey, an infectious disease specialist at Georgetown University. https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2020/01/wuhan-seafood-market-may-not-be-source-novel-virus-spreading-globally
Apart from this early case, between December 8 and December 18, seven cases later diagnosed with Wuhan Coronavirus were documented, two of them were linked with the Huanan Seafood Wholesale Market of Wuhan, five were not. https://www.nejm.org/doi/10.1056/NEJMoa2001316
“…Bluedot, a Toronto startup whose AI-driven health monitoring platform analyzes billions of data points. Launched in 2014, the venture alerted its clients to the outbreak on Dec. 31, well ahead of notifications from the World Health Organization and US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.” https://qz.com/1791222/how-artificial-intelligence-provided-early-warning-of-wuhan-virus/
No food in supermarkets, no supplies in hospitals and people dropping to pavements and lannai, apparently China is heavily censoring most media trying to get out. We are just seeing bits that slipped through.
Can’t verify: Judging by the architecture this a semi rural area near a Chinese city. Authorities appear to shooting to prevent people fleeing this location.
Do not take the bus without a mask! It is true that many people are not afraid of death. This method can also correct misunderstanding. They read official reports will lead to information asymmetry, and mistakenly realize that the number of infected people is not so large! Another is because they are people who have been educated by the party for many years, and they believe in the power of the government.
Wuhan: Video of the man in Sanli Minzu Community Hospital in Hanyang District said that his mother had fever for four or five days. He went to the community hospital for help without hospital admission, but there was no doctor in the community hospital! What a helpless Wuhan citizen! I spent every day in panic, I don’t know which day it’s my turn. https://toronto.citynews.ca/2020/01/27/2nd-presumptive-case-coronavirus-toronto/
This is a punishment slip. On December 30, several people in Wuhan spread news of the pneumonia epidemic in Wuhan on WeChat. These messages were identified as rumors by the Wuhan government, so these people were punished by Wuhan police….
What virus? Has anything to do with me? Continue to gather like this, the virus must not be able to control, but it just happens to cater to the high-level meaning, the more deaths, the better. Can no fellow countryman live a little bit alive?
http://cn.ntdtv.com/gb/2020/01/27/ “Foreign media: How the Chinese Communist Party stole the coronavirus from Canada as a biochemical weapon. A smuggling ship was seized from Canada last year. This traces back to Chinese spies working in Canadian laboratories.”
He had a high fever of 39 degrees for four consecutive days. He went to the hospital to get medicine. Because the hospital had no medicine, the patient took off a mask and made a cough intentionally in front of the medical staff when he went downstairs to refund.
On the evening of January 28, authorities in Xiapu County, Fujian Province #武漢肺炎 The patient quarantine area has caused police-civilian conflict, and information needs to be further verified. According to Chinanews.com, on January 28, 2020, the Xiapu County Response Command reported to the public that an idle factory dormitory building in Dasha Park was selected as a backup point for close contacts to concentrate their views. This move was opposed by villagers in Dasha Village, which led to conflict.
A man from #Wuhan talking about how serious the situation is. One crematorium cremated over 20 bodies per day, gov. still covering up. People don’t know much about real situation, etc. The reason he chose to share audio instead of text is that text can be detected and removed.
On the 28th, the Wuhan Institute of Virology of the Chinese Academy of Sciences and the Institute of Toxicology and Drugs of the Academy of Military Medical Sciences jointly discovered that #新型冠状病毒 There are three kinds of “old medicines” such as Remidevi or Lendesivir (GS-5734), Chloroquine (Sigma-C6628) and Ritonavir (Ritonavir), which have better inhibitory effects. Its subsequent clinical use is undergoing related procedures for approval. #nCoV2019
Ontario Public Health doesn’t have a coronavirus tool kit so they are using one for TB….. TB is highly contagious… which means so is this virus people fear TB…. why are they not scared of this?
On February 1, Fang Bin, a Wuhan citizen who filmed the body during the transportation at the Fifth Hospital of Wuhan, was intruded into his home by a person claiming to be an epidemic prevention station. The relevant information is currently being verified, and he has not been contacted.
Thanks to the International attention, Mr. FangBin/#方斌, was released. Turns out, the #police falsely claimed they were from Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and searched Fang’s home without search warrant. He did no thing but report the TRUTH
Prime Minister Justin Trudeau said on Saturday that “there is no place for discrimination driven by fear” in Canada, as he delivered remarks at a Chinese Lunar New Year celebration in the east-end of Toronto. Trudeau condemned racism linked to the coronavirus outbreak, which originated in Wuhan, China.
[Wuhan Huanggang implements a ban on going out] [Public security tied the door with iron chains from house to house] Wuhan City has recently imposed a ban on going out. All people are isolated at home, and one person can be sent out to buy food in two days. In order to ensure that the people abide by the ban, the police asked house-by-house, “Do you have any vegetables and rice?” If so, the gates were tied up with iron chains. #武汉肺炎#封关#禁足 Online video
Shi Mingjin ’s newly built Vulcan Mountain Hospital (?) Like the freezer, the doorknob is only available on the outside, and people inside cannot come out. All food and items are put in the isolation window, and no one will touch the patient. Does no one touch the patient mean … I didn’t want to treat you? https://www.zerohedge.com/health/creator-bioweapons-act-says-coronavirus-biological-warfare-weapon
#武汉肺炎真相 A secretly recorded conversation with a doctor is just the tip of the iceberg of the truth in Wuhan ① Six or seven died in the outpatient clinic two days. Funeral home not towed away, emergency department into morgue ② In Wuhan, Hankou Funeral Home specializes in receiving patients with this severe pneumonia ③ The government says that only forty people died in our small hospital, and at least one or two people die every day! Where is the big hospital ④ What happened on December 8th … the words of the government are fake
[Wuhan built a “square cabin hospital” in one week] [Beds are separated by 2 feet without barriers] On the evening of February 3, Wuhan set up three “square cabin hospitals”, namely Hongshan Stadium (800 beds) and Wuhan Living Room (2000 Beds), International Convention and Exhibition Center (1000 beds), specializing in treating patients with mild pneumonia. Some netizens questioned that there was almost no isolation between patients, and thousands of people shared limited toilets and bathroom facilities, like a concentration camp. Online video
Wen Gui launched a violent attack on the party leader’s representative in English in a fast and smooth way, and heard me sing and drink wildly. Xi is a bad guy Xi is a murderer Xi is the root cause of this disaster CCP is the killer of this disaster. Xi has finished. He will be jailed and killed. CCP is dead, there is no future
#nCoV2019 out break seems facilitated #CCP‘s dissident hunting: Social justice lawyer #ChenQiushi, aka #陈秋实, who has been voicing out the truth about #WuhanCoronvirus vanished. The gov. said he’s under quarantine but no one heard any thing from him:
[I report: Ai Yuejin, a CCP officer, “guilt rumor”] In February 2020, a man in Inner Mongolia fabricated a “new coronavirus that is a genetic weapon used by the United States against China” and has been arrested by police Ai Yuejin said in the video that the 2003 SARS epidemic was a virus weapon developed by the United States against China! The evidence is conclusive, please the CCP authorities to arrest Ai Yuejin according to law! Otherwise, China’s 1.4 billion people are not convinced!
Aunt struggling and crying: I don’t want to live anymore, you guys killed me, I don’t want to live anymore. ” The policeman cursed: “You die your mother *, you die early …” The defenseless people had no choice but to be forcibly dragged away from their homes to the quarantine zone and insulted by the police. #武汉疫情#唯真不破
Butchers also want to confiscate their meat! But how to deal with the confiscated pork, the urban management law enforcement team (bandits) will not say.
The video is the old man in Wutongyuan Community, because I can’t buy a mask! Detained for 5 days, and transcribed 100 times a day, “Must wear a mask when going out.” After going home, he committed suicide.
[Bannon War Room Pandemic] EP14-01 Featured Clip: This is how they always handle things. At the beginning, they blocked the news and lied, because they have been lying, they may change and conceal the local facts and develop this Wuhan epidemic into a biochemical Chernobyl incident! Stay tuned for the Bannon War Room (Himalayan Warhawks)
#武漢肺炎 Netizens picked up the news of 2018 and looked at the report of the CCP at the time. They were also proud of it. Who made the virus and leaked it? The Chinese Communist Party is the common enemy of all mankind.
Respiratory experts revealed: #新冠病毒 Not only destroy the human lung, but also the human heart, liver, kidney and blood system! In addition, #瑞德西韦 Only for minor patients within 8 days of onset! why? 1 Mainly can improve the cure rate, showing our party cattle B 2 Severely ill patients must die, reduce burden on the party, save food and financial expenses
At around 1 pm today, February 13, Beijing time, residents in Wuhan, including Jiangxia, Guanggu, Xudong, Nanhu, Dongxihu, etc., heard loud noises. Weibo netizens said that glass and floor were shaking. The plane kept flying after the ring.
Don’t understand what is being said? Personal speculation may be asymptomatic coma or death (purely personal opinion). If the virus mutates to asymptomatic, it will be a catastrophe for humans all over the world. It is said that the virus cannot be cured and will leave severe sequelae.
On January 27th 2020, CBC News published an article denouncing claims that Chinese scientists working at the National Microbiology Laboratory in Winnipeg were involved in smuggling the new coronavirus to the Wuhan Laboratory in China (1). They went on to label several online alternative media sites as “Fake News” referring to the stories as “baseless,” “misinformation,” and “conspiracy theory based on distorted reading.” They went on to say that “CBC reporting never claimed the two scientists were spies,” and that this disinformation created a “social panic” online. CBC then referred to experts who called for the online censorship of social media.
Earlier, CIN published a series of articles from several news sources, including CBC, that showed conflicting evidence to their claims above. Here is our summary:
That Chinese scientists were fired from the National Microbiology Laboratory.
The Chinese scientists involved had taken numerous trips to China and that a third party (whose name was redacted by the freedom of information office) was paying for these trips.
That several researchers fearing retribution wished to remain anonymous but stated that there were concerns regarding the travel to-from China.
That supervisors in that lab prevented researchers from speaking with the RCMP.
There were other breaches in the past where pathogens were smuggled out of the laboratory by other Chinese scientists.
That the RCMP was investigating the unlawful transfer of pathogens to China.
That the Chinese scientists trained other Chinese researchers at the Wuhan laboratory.
And that the lab in Wuhan where the Chinese Scientists trained researchers had ties to the Chinese Military.
That the Chinese scientist had also shared intellectual property with a Chinese pharmaceutical company (Mabworks) to produce the Ebola vaccine (ZMAPP) without authorization.
Research revealed that the Coronavirus was sent from Saudi Arabia, to the Netherlands (Eramus Medical Center) and then to Canada (National Microbiology Laboratory) in 2012, where the Chinese scientists under investigation were working.
Online sources revealed that the World Health Organization is working with the Eramus Medical Center in the Netherlands and teams working on the current novel Coronavirus in Wuhan, China.
Sources also revealed that the SARS virus outbreak was cause by the release of the virus from a Beijing laboratory.
Statements from Dr. Frank Plummer, the director of the National Microbiology lab in Canada, indicate that while he was in charge he was also a closet alcoholic and did not generally supervise the work (2). He said, as director of the lab he “basically set people free to do their jobs. And I tried to run interference for them, and get them the money that they needed for them to do their jobs.”
A report in NATURE now reveals that in 2004 the SARS virus originated in Beijing China, had escaped from high-level containment facility there.
Numerous sources support that coronavirus was released from the Wuhan National Biosafety laboratory either accidentally or intentionally.
Recently, scientific journal The Lancet established that the coronavirus may not have originated from bats as was claimed by Chinese scientists in Wuhan, who have blamed the outbreak on the ingestion of “bats” sold at the local “wet markets (3)”.
These are our two articles:
From Canada to China: Wuhan Coronavirus Launches Global Depopulation Plan (4)
Below are the articles published by the CBC on this subject. We also include the full articles for you to review, and provide relevant excerpts below each one that have led several online media sources to come to the conclusions that they did. The CBC called our articles “misinformation”. Is the CBC now covering up what appears to be international sabotage from China? And why would they themselves imply that these Chinese Scientists were complicit? Why was there an RCMP investigation in the first place if this was innocent? And why the cover up? You be the Judge. As far as we are concerned CBC is “Fake News…. Really, Really Fake News”!
Below, for the sake of preservation, we included links to the original CBC articles plus captures and text of the articles in their original form:
CBC VIDEO dated July 15, 2019: CBC News: The National Chinese researcher removed from Canada’s only level-4 lab
“Public Health Agency asked police to look into ‘administrative matter’ at Canada’s only Level 4 virology lab. Manitoba RCMP are investigating a possible policy breach at the National Microbiology Lab in Winnipeg.”
“Few details have been made public, but an RCMP spokesperson confirms police received a referral from the Public Health Agency of Canada. The agency did not clarify when the incident occurred or specify what happened, but said it notified RCMP on May 24, 2019.”
“The National Microbiology Lab is the only Level 4 virology facility in Canada — meaning a lab equipped to work with the most serious and deadly human and animal diseases. That makes the Arlington Street lab one of only a handful in North America capable of handling pathogens requiring the highest level of containment, such as Ebola, HIV and anthrax.”
“This isn’t the first time police have investigated an incident at the lab. In 2009, a former researcher at the lab was convicted of trying to smuggle genetic material from the Ebola virus across the Manitoba-North Dakota border. Konan Michel Yao had 22 vials of the substance in the trunk of his car when he tried to cross the border. The vials were wrapped in aluminum foil inside a glove and packaged in a plastic bag, along with electrical wires.”
“The Winnipeg lab reviewed its biosecurity protocol after that incident.”
“A researcher with ties to China was recently escorted out of the National Microbiology Lab (NML) in Winnipeg amid an RCMP investigation into what’s being described as a possible “policy breach.”
“Dr. Xiangguo Qiu, her husband Keding Cheng and an unknown number of her students from China were removed from Canada’s only level-4 lab on July 5, CBC News has learned.”
“A Level 4 virology facility is a lab equipped to work with the most serious and deadly human and animal diseases. That makes the Arlington Street lab one of only a handful in North America capable of handling pathogens requiring the highest level of containment, such as Ebola.”
“Security access for the couple and the Chinese students was revoked, according to sources who work at the lab and do not want to be identified because they fear consequences for speaking out.”
“Sources say this comes several months after IT specialists for the NML entered Qiu’s office after-hours and replaced her computer. Her regular trips to China also started being denied.”
‘Microbiology can … involve national security’
“While there are few details available, experts say this could be a case of intellectual property theft or technology leakage to China.”
“The National Microbiology Laboratory would have some pretty sensitive biological research material that … could be shared either with or without authorization with foreign countries,” said Gordon Houlden, director of the University of Alberta’s China Institute. “
“It’s something the Canadian Security Intelligence Service has already warned about, said Leah West, who teaches national security law at Carleton’s Norman Paterson School of International Affairs.”
“Canada is facing threats from foreign governments seeking to steal intellectual property and that could include state-funded research,”
“China and Canada’s relationship right now stems from China using espionage to advance its strategic interests, be that its security interests or its economic interests,” West said.”
“This isn’t the first time police have investigated an incident at the lab. In 2009, a former researcher at the lab was convicted of trying to smuggle genetic material from the Ebola virus across the Manitoba-North Dakota border. The FBI is also investigating cases involving Chinese researchers in the United States.”
“The University of Manitoba has cut ties with two researchers who were escorted out the National Microbiology Lab (NML) in Winnipeg earlier this month, until an RCMP investigation is complete.”
“According to sources inside the NML, Qiu, Cheng and an unknown number of her students from China were removed from the lab on July 5. The level-4 virology facility — the only one in Canada — is equipped to work with the most serious and deadly human and animal diseases.”
“Security access for the couple and the Chinese students was revoked. Sources say this comes several months after IT specialists for the NML entered Qiu’s office after hours and replaced her computer. Her regular trips to China also started being denied.”
“Manitoba RCMP started an investigation after the Public Health Agency of Canada (PHAC) contacted them on May 24.”
“PHAC is describing the situation as a possible “policy breach” and is taking steps to “resolve it expeditiously,” said Eric Morrissette, the health agency’s chief of media relations. He has declined further comment, citing privacy reasons. Officials won’t say what kind of policy breach would be serious enough to warrant a referral to the RCMP.”
“It was not immediately clear if Qui is a Canadian citizen, permanent resident or a Chinese national.”
“The situation also came up during a news conference with the secretary-general of NATO. Jens Stoltenberg, who toured CFB Petawawa on Monday and met with Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, said at a news conference he couldn’t comment on this specific case, but appeared to suggest the possibility of espionage. “What I can say in general is that we have seen increased efforts by the nations to spy on NATO allies in different ways,” he said . “This is partly about industrial espionage and it affects our military forces and military intelligence so this is something that we take very seriously.”
“Xiangguo Qiu — who was escorted out of the Winnipeg lab in July amid an RCMP investigation into what’s being described by Public Health Agency of Canada as a possible “policy breach” — was invited to go to the Wuhan National Biosafety Laboratory of the Chinese Academy of Sciences twice a year for two years, for up to two weeks each time.”
“This will be third-party funded, and therefore no cost to [the Public Health Agency of Canada],” say the documents, obtained through access to information requests. The identity of the third-party was redacted.”
“During a Sept. 19-30, 2017, trip, she also met with collaborators in Beijing, the documents say, but their names have also been blacked out.”
“Qiu, her husband Keding Cheng and her students from China were removed on July 5 from Canada’s only Level 4 lab — one equipped to work with the most serious and deadly human and animal diseases, such as Ebola. Security access for the couple and the Chinese students was revoked, sources who work at the lab previously told CBC News.”
“Several of them, who asked not to be identified for fears of retribution, say there have always been questions about Qiu’s trips to China — and what information and technology she was sharing with researchers there.”
“It’s not right that she’s a Canadian government employee providing details of top-secret work and know-how to set up a high-containment lab for a foreign nation,” one employee said.”
“The staff member claims RCMP officers have not yet interviewed key people at the lab, because senior management has not made them accessible to police or allowed staff to contact them with relevant information”.
Did CBC try to backpedal on their own stories? Did they get a frantic call in the night from one of Trudeau’s lackeys? One thing is clear: it is crucial in these times to check the references on articles you find, and follow through on reading things for yourself.
Bill Gates Foundation, Rothschild Vanguard & Blackrock ChiCom manufacture Wuhan Coronavirus outbreak by funding both the creation of the virus and the vaccine. Bill Gates is the New World Order’s equivalent of a chief science officer. As such, his top priority is depopulation. His stated method is vaccines. Bill is walking in his fathers footsteps, who was also tasked with depopulation while head of Planned Parenthood (47). A proud legacy of eugenicists.
On January 9, 2020, the UN announced that the Wuhan Coronavirus had a lot of similarities to SARS (Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome) and MERS (Middle East Respiratory Syndrome) (1)(2).
A Coronavirus is a virus that causes an infection in your nose, sinuses, or upper throat. It can lead to pneumonia (4)(5). Most Coronaviruses are not dangerous. Some types of them are serious, such as MERS and SARS (6). The name comes from the crown-like appearance the virus displays.
On May 4, 2013, the National Microbiology Lab in Winnipeg MB, Canada, received the MERS virus from the Erasmus Medical Centre in Rotterdam, the Netherlands. Dr. Frank Plummer confirmed this in a CTV article from May 14, 2013 (7).
These two pdf files from the World Health Organization shows recent collaboration between the Eramus Medical Center in the Netherlands and teams working on the current novel Coronavirus in Wuhan, China.
A CBC article from May 19, 2013, confirms the virus sent to National Microbiology Laboratory (NML) in Winnipeg was a Saudi sample. Dr. Plummer of NML, said that they were unable to share it with other researchers because of Dutch restrictions. The Saudi researcher, Ali Mohamed Zaki, who first spotted the Coronavirus in 2012 in the lab of Dr. Soliman Fakeeh Hospital in Jeddah and then sent a sample to the Erasmus Medical Center in the Netherlands, Saudi Arabia was fired.
A year later, Dr. Plummer left the National Microbiology Lab in Canada after 14 years (9). It is noteworthy to mention that the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation funded Dr. Plummer’s HIV research as well as the research of other prominent Canadian scientists, Dr. Lorn Babiuk and Dr. Brett Finlay, who received in total 436.6 million in research funds (10).
There’s no indication however, of any connection between that and the Coronavirus. What is relevant however is that Dr. Plummer has now openly admitted to being a long-term alcoholic while working at the level 4 containment laboratory that required the highest level of safety clearance. He is undergoing electrical stimulation of the brain for alcoholism. He is also preparing to push ahead with an experimental vaccine against HIV infection, and is working on writing a memoir.
Canadian scientist undergoes novel brain stimulation treatment for alcoholism:
Plummer has also stated that while he was the head of the National Microbiology Lab of Canada, he didn’t generally supervise the work (46). He said, as director of the lab he “basically set people free to do their jobs. And I tried to run interference for them, and get them the money that they needed for them to do their jobs well — and it worked!”
He set them free? Just who exactly was running that lab?
Recently a researcher with ties to China was recently escorted out of the National Microbiology Lab (NML) in Winnipeg amid an RCMP investigation into what’s being described as a possible “policy breach.” Dr. Xiangguo Qiu, her husband Keding Cheng, and an unknown number of her students from China were removed from Canada’s only level-4 lab on July 5, 2019. A Level 4 virology facility is a lab equipped to work with the most serious & deadly human and animal diseases (12)(13).
In 2014, Dr. Xiangguo Qiu and a research team at the National Microbiology Laboratory in Canada that created a drug (ZMAPP) that could treat Ebola (14). Shortly after, many companies started clinical trials for Ebola vaccines, some of which were founded by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. Some of these companies include: Novavax, and Mabworks among others (15).
The Council on Foreign Relations reported on June 16, 2017, some of the highlights and connections between a few of the drug manufacturers. It appears as though the Chinese military got their hands on ZMAPP through a Beijing company called Mabworks and were in violation of copy write infringement (16). When asked by the US Department of Defense, Mabworks they stated they had a licensing agreement with the intellectual property rights holder for ZMAPP.Mabworks later admitted they had duplicated the drug without authorization (12).
This PDF Document highlights the connection between the Chinese Military and Mabworks. The drug consists of three monoclonal antibodies, two of which were originally developed with support from U.S. and Canadian military research agencies. Put differently, the U.S. government and Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada hold patents for two of the antibodies in ZMAPP. As a result, government officials expressed patent infringement concerns (16). But who provided them with the research data to do so?
This National Post article explains how Dr. Qiu and her co-worker worked for the Chinese firm Mabworks while they were doing research for the National Microbiology Laboratory in Canada, employed by the Canadian Government. They insist that they did nothing untoward by giving the Ebola vaccine over to the Chinese authorities because it was about saving lives (17).
In 2019, security access for the Dr. Qui, her husband and Chinese students working at the National Laboratory Institution was revoked and Dr. Oui was dismissed and her ties with the University of Manitoba were cut. Inside sources, fearful of retribution and wanting to remain anonymous had this to say (18)(12):
There have always been questions about Qiu’s trips to China — and what information and technology she was sharing with researchers there. “It’s not right that she’s a Canadian government employee providing details of top-secret work and know-how to set up a high-containment lab for a foreign nation,” one employee said. The staff member claims RCMP officers have not yet interviewed key people at the lab, because senior management has not made them accessible to police or allowed staff to contact them with relevant information.
Citing privacy concerns, neither the Public Health Agency of Canada (PHAC) nor the RCMP are providing further details. There is speculation that the group facilitated the unauthorized transfer of research and biological materials to China which may include the sharing of Ebola, as well as a second pathogen. The potential transfer of knowledge and pathogens to China may be advancing their biological weapons program (19)(20)(12).
The only lab in China with level 4 clearance that does research with deadly pathogens is Wuhan National Biosafety Lab located in the city where the outbreak has started (21). As previously reported, Dr. Xiangguo Qui, who was dismissed from the National Microbiology Laboratory in Winnipeg, trained staff at this laboratory in Wuhan.
According to travel documents obtained through an access to information request, Dr. Oui made at least five trips to China in 2017-18, including one to train scientists and technicians at this site. These trips were funded by a “third party” and the identity of the third party was redacted. During a Sept. 19-30, 2017, trip, she also met with collaborators in Beijing, the documents say, but their names have also been blacked out (18)(12).
On a side note: Remember Novavax that created the Ebola vaccine? Apparently they are now creating a vaccine for this Wuhan Coronavirus. Look how much their stock jumped in value when they announced they were developing the vaccine; 71% is a pretty health investment!
The top Institutional shareholders for Novavax are shown here and they includes: the Vanguard Group (Rothschild), BlackRock (China) and the Munich-based company called Allianz (22). Allianz has been in China since 1917 and has formed several partnerships including one with CITIC Group owned by the People’s Republic of China (23)(24) and a founding partner of the Canada China Business Council (25)(12)(26).
Mabworks parent company is Guotai Junan Securities. In 2002, Guotai Junan Securities and Allianz partnered to form Guo’an Fund Management (27)(28)(12). What does this mean? In layman’s terms: Novavax is partly owned by Allianz who also tied to the Chinese firm Mabworks; the same Chinese company that Chinese Scientist Dr. Qui provided research for while working for the Canadian government; the same Chinese scientist who set up the level 4 research lab in Wahan China located at the epicenter of the outbreak; the very same Chinese scientist currently under RCMP investigation for possible pathogen and intellectual property theft (19)(12). And Novavax just announced they are working on the Coronavirus Vaccine. Allianz, the institutional owner of Novavax and has also partnered with Bill Gates’ Microsoft to digitally transform the insurance industry and on other health-related initiatives (29)(30). But maybe this is all a just coincidence?
Novavax has also received millions in funding for research from the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation to help develop vaccines for global health issues, specifically for treating pneumonia (31)(32)(33)(34).
The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation also co-hosted a pandemic exercise in late 2019 in late 2019 that simulated a global coronavirus outbreak. Their simulation predicted that it could kill 65 million people within the year (35)(36)(37)! Another coincidence (38)?
The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation also fund the UK-based Pirbright Institute (39). The Pirbright Institute has been in existence for over 100 years. It was first established as a cattle testing station for tuberculosis in 1914 and has developed over the years to become one of the UK’s leading virus diagnostics and surveillance centers and is now also at the forefront of virus research (40).
The Pirbright Institute has held the patent to this deadly Coronavirus since 2015 (41). On June 19, 2015, Pirbright Institute filed an application for a patent for the live coronavirus, which was approved on Nov 20, 2018 (42).
A coalition led by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation is currently leading a group of scientist working on a vaccine to solve this Coronavirus crisis (43). The question left unanswered is, who caused this crisis?
Bill Gate’s position on climate change and lowering CO2 emissions are based on population control. In this video, he openly admits that vaccines will be used to lower population:
“If we do a really good job on new vaccines, healthcare, reproductive health services we could lower that (population) by 10-15%.”
Gates is also an advocate of Voluntary Euthanasia also know as “Death Panels” where bureaucrats decide if an individual is worthy of health care or not. With the Coronavirus outbreak the balance of life, or death remains in the hands of those with the vaccine (44). God help us all!
This story will not end well. Please read our update that will reveal how Bill Gates, George Soros have partnered up with the United Nations and China to control our drug distribution!
Do you believe in coincidences? Funny how the big wigs all got together to discuss a Coronavirus Pandemic in October 2019; the UN, WHO, the big banks, Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. The Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security in partnership, the World Economic Forum and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation hosted the event:
At the conference they said that they were going to be blackmailing countries to come up with the big bucks required or they would not be getting supplies of medicine but the UN guaranteed low income countries would be saved.
The UN is hoping that the Coronavirus will close down the tourist and travel industry to help control climate change. And many people in large cities will not be going out of their homes and this will result in huge climate change savings.
China says that the world will not be able to survive the financial meltdown as a result of the epidemic (2)(3). The world will have to move to a centralized currency system to help stave off collapse. US says the world has to move to a “war footing” and the major transnational corporations are calling for an emergency Marshall Plan that will give them huge tax breaks.
The UN is expecting massive deaths from the release of the Coronavirus. They predicted up to 65 Million lives could be lost (4). This pandemic is comparable to the Spanish flu epidemic in 1918 where 500 million people were affected (30% of the world’s population) and 50 million people died (5)(6). By comparison to our world’s population now, at 7.8 billion, and due to global movement of people, we predict the number of infected individuals to be more than 2.6 billion (6)!
The UN is expecting virtual economic collapse with countries down GDP near 11% which is very good for the climate change Hysteria. Credit markets will freeze and stock market will collapse between 20% to 40%. The UN is warning warning that the world will collapse into complete Anarchy that could last for decades!
In an emergency move the internet is going to be shut down in order to “quell panic”. The flow of information will be very strictly controlled at the highest levels. Governments will censor alternative media platforms and internet shutdowns will be implemented. Social media platforms must provide “accurate” information or they will be shutdown as “fake news”. Only trusted media sources will be allowed to report on the pandemic!
And they have already started. Yesterday after CIN reported on the Coronavirus and it’s ties to Canada, China and the Pharmaceutical industry (7), we received a notice from GOOGLE AdSense that they would be deleting adds from our site. The thing is, the main sources we used to write up that article came from the CBC? So what are they hiding? Was the Coronavirus released intentionally? Do they already have the vaccine?
Friends, 2020 will be known as the “Year of the Purge!”
#HumanityPurge #InternetPurge #RealNewsPurge
Let 2020 be known as the year of the purge! #HumanityPurge #InternetPurge #NewsPurge
The fact is, with so much focus on increasingly virulent virus’, a pandemic outbreak is only around the corner…… and may in fact, already be here!
Let’s see how Canada is connected to the Coronavirus outbreak.
A researcher with ties to China was recently escorted out of the National Microbiology Lab (NML) in Winnipeg amid an RCMP investigation into what’s being described as a possible “policy breach.” Dr. Xiangguo Qiu, her husband Keding Cheng, and an unknown number of her students from China were removed from Canada’s only level-4 lab on July 5, 2019. A Level 4 virology facility is a lab equipped to work with the most serious & deadly human and animal diseases (1).
Dr. Qui is currently head of the Vaccine Development & Antiviral Therapies section in the Special Pathogens Program at the lab, her primary field is immunology. Her research focuses on vaccine development, post-exposure therapeutics & rapid diagnostics of viruses like Ebola (2)(3). Her husband Keding Cheng also works at the lab as a biologist. He has published research papers on HIV infections, Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS), E. coli infections & Creutzfeldt-Jakob Syndrome (4)(5)(1).
In 2009, a former Chinese researcher at the lab, Konan Michel Yao, was convicted of trying to smuggle genetic material from the Ebola virus across the Manitoba-North Dakota border (6)(7).
The only lab in China with level 4 clearance that does research with deadly pathogens is Wuhan National Biosafety Lab located in the city where the outbreak has started (8). Dr. Xiangguo Qui, who was dismissed from the National Microbiology Laboratory in Winnipeg, trained staff at this laboratory in Wuhan. According to travel documents obtained through an access to information request, Dr. Oui made at least five trips to China in 2017-18, including one to train scientists and technicians at this site. These trips were funded by a “third party” and the identity of the third party was redacted. During a Sept. 19-30, 2017, trip, she also met with collaborators in Beijing, the documents say, but their names have also been blacked out (9).
Security access for the couple and the Chinese students was revoked and Dr. Oui was dismissed and her ties with the University of Manitoba were cut. Inside sources, fearful of retribution and wanting to remain anonymous had this to say (9):
There have always been questions about Qiu’s trips to China — and what information and technology she was sharing with researchers there. “It’s not right that she’s a Canadian government employee providing details of top-secret work and know-how to set up a high-containment lab for a foreign nation,” one employee said. The staff member claims RCMP officers have not yet interviewed key people at the lab, because senior management has not made them accessible to police or allowed staff to contact them with relevant information.
This is taken directly from the CBC News Article. Judge for yourself?
Citing privacy concerns, Neither the Public Health Agency of Canada (PHAC) nor the RCMP are providing further details. There is speculation that the group facilitated the unauthorized transfer of research and biological materials to China which may include the sharing of Ebola, as well as a second pathogen, a henipavirus, which can kills 100% of those infected. The potential transfer of knowledge and pathogens to China may be advancing their biological weapons program (10)(11).
While working at the National Microbiology Laboratory here in Canada, Dr. Qui was involved in the development of the Ebola treatment drug, ZMapp, which has already been cloned by a Chinese company Mabworks, even though the the experimental drug was under patent. Mabworks admitted they had duplicated the drug without authorization, and then continued working with researchers in Canada (12).
Who is Mabworks? How did they obtain information on this drug? And are they the “third party” funding Dr. Qui’s work in China? Regardless, the lack of transparency by both the government of Canada and the People’s Republic of China is evident! What are they hiding?
In 2004, China refused entry to the World Health Organization to Guangdong Province (Beijing) where SARS originated, after months of sweeping it under the rug (13)! A report in NATURE now reveals that in 2004 the SARS virus had escaped from high-level containment facilities in Beijing multiple times (8)! Records show that Dr. Qui was also working with the National Microbiology Lab in Winnipeg at that time as well (14). But maybe this too is coincidental? Was the release of the Coronavirus accidental or intentional? The lack of transparency behind these events is so blatantly obvious that our conclusion points to the latter!
The Wuhan National Biosafety Laboratory, where Dr. Qui trained researchers, is the only lab in China designated for studying dangerous pathogens like SARS and Ebola. In 2017 Scientists warned that a SARS-like virus could escape that lab (8)(15). Now, a SARS-like coronavirus that has originated in Wuhan China, has infected more than 900 there, spread to at least 10 other countries and killed 26 in Wuhan and nearby provinces and has led authorities to quarantine more than 20 million people across Chinam (16)(17)! And within the next 14 days, by February 4, 2020, models predicts the number of infected people in Wuhan to be greater than 250 thousand (18)!
The Wuhan National Biosafety Laboratory is located 20 miles away from the Huanan Seafood Market, the outbreak epicenter, and some have wondered if this is coincidental (17)? Three months ago the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation and other health experts issued an ominous warning about a coronavirus pandemic. Their simulation predicted that it could kill 65 million people within the year (19)(20)(21)! Another coincidence?
A team of scientists in the US and China are now working on a vaccine for this Coronavirus. According to Dr. Peter Hotez (22),
It is “remarkable” that scientists are able to start developing a vaccine for a virus that was identified less than a month ago, he said. He credited Chinese researchers, who quickly sequenced and published the virus’s genome.”With SARS, it took almost a year to be able to identify and map the full genetic code,” he said. “Now we’re doing this in just a few weeks.
Chinese scientists were able to isolate this coronavirus, determine the genetic sequence and publish the data all in under 13 days (23)(24)! Remarkable or just another coincidence? Perhaps it will be another coincidence when the Chinese develop the vaccine?
Here at CIN, we decided to follow the most obvious pathway, so we investigated the Chinese firm Mabworks Biotech Company Ltd. Founded in 2003, it is specialized in the research and development of genetically engineered antibody drugs with headquarters in Beijing China (25)(26).
Shenzhen GTJA Investment Group is a subsidiary of GTJA (Guotai Junan) Securities, a leading Chinese investment bank established in 1999 that is partly owned by the People’s Republic of China, but the company’s international business is operated out of Hong Kong through it’s subsidiary Guotai Junan International. It was the first company in China to initiate a public securities company for China in Hong Kong in 1995, the first to establish a research institute for China in 1995, the first to serve as the primary dealer of China’s Central Bank in the open market, and the first public enterprise under the ownership of Mainland China. Basically it’s China’s corporate arm in the free market (29).
In 2002, China approved the first joint ventures management firm; Guotai Junan Securities (parent company to Mabworks Biotech) and Allianz of Germany partnered to form Guo’an Fund Management (30)(31). This event, of epoch-making significance in the development of China’s securities industry, marks an important step taken by China in honoring its promises made for WTO membership (32).
Allianz has been in China since 1917 has formed several other partnerships: with CITIC Group owned by the People’s Republic of China (33)(34) and with the Desmarais family empire through Manulife Corporation (35)(36). Both Allianz and Power Corporation of Canada are partnered with the UN Global Compact on Migration, and by extension so is it’s international partner, the People’s Republic of China! That’s right! They are all part of Agenda 2030 population control!
On September 2008, news came out linking the Munich-based Company Allianz to Nazi Germany and the third Reich. During 1933-1945, Allianz had given money owed to Jewish life insurance policy beneficiaries to the Nazi government. Records showed Allianz insured the property and personnel of the Auschwitz extermination camp as well as the Dachau concentration camp and the engineers who worked at the IG Farben Company; the company that manufactured the Zyklon B cyanide gas used at the concentration camps to kill Jews and other victims (39). Allianz also provided insurance throughout the war to Nazis who seized property from Hitler’s war victims. In addition, Allianz’s Chief Executive at the time was Hitler’s Economic Minister (40). The globalist choice of weapon for population control during WWll was cyanide gas! Today, they are employing biological weapons of mass destruction! But hey… maybe this too is all just a coincidence?
“I’m sorry,” the editorial alleged Trudeau to have said. “If I had known you were reporting for a national paper, I never would have been so forward.” (ref)
Watch this asshole mutter his way through explaining his entirely illegal conversation with John Kerry who were secretly discussing how Obama had a plan to keep Trump from office.(ref)
• New Investigation ordered in Khan Island vacation: (ref)(ref)
Trudeau opened the door for China to continue dumping their garbage steel in Canada. Trump had good reason for using “National Security” as a basis for steel tariffs to address the issue of Chinese steel dumping. The US uses a lot of ‘Canadian’ steel, and CA is considered part of US defense industrial base. This is dangerous.(ref)
(The globalist UN, showing its true colours once again)
(In 2007, the Canadian House of Commons Foreign Affairs Committee voted to endorse the idea of the UN Parliament. Stephen Harper was Prime Minister. Self-identified “populist” Maxime Bernier would soon be the Foreign Affairs Minister, and said nothing.)
(Seriously, this was previously approved in 1993?)
To all the conspiracy theorists who believe that the UN is proposing setting up a one world government, your fears just became validated.
The UN formally proposes to do exactly that.
2. Quotes From Site
The proposal of a UN Parliamentary Assembly
In this age of globalization, more and more issues have a global dimension that requires global cooperation. At the UN and other international fora, governments come together to negotiate and decide on policies that affect us all. . The UN Charter begins on the promising opening words: “We the peoples.” However, one will seek in vain for any clause in the document that specifies a means by which ordinary people can play a role in the organization’s deliberations and decision-making. . The bodies of the UN and international organizations are occupied by officials who are appointed by the executive branches of national governments. In view of the growing importance of international organizations and their decisions, this is no longer sufficient. . A United Nations Parliamentary Assembly (UNPA) for the first time would give popularly elected representatives a formal role in global affairs. As an additional body, the assembly will directly represent the world’s citizens and not governments. . Initially, states could choose whether their UNPA members would come from national parliaments, reflecting their political spectrum and gender equality, or whether they would be directly elected. Eventually, the goal is to have all members directly elected. . Starting as a largely consultative body, the rights and powers of the UNPA could be expanded over time as its democratic legitimacy increases. The assembly will act as an independent watchdog in the UN system and as a democratic reflection of the diversity of world public opinion. . In the long run, once its members are all democratically elected, the assembly could be developed into a world parliament which – under certain conditions and in conjunction with the UN General Assembly – may be able to adopt universally binding regulations. . In short, the UN should evolve from what many believe to be a generally ineffectual “talk-shop” into a viable democratic and legislative body.
Okay, let’s break this down a bit:
”In this age of globalization, more and more issues have a global dimension that requires global cooperation. At the UN and other international fora, governments come together to negotiate and decide on policies that affect us all.”
So what? This seems to deliberately conflate cooperation with sovereignty. Nations can and do discuss and cooperate on issues all the time. This is a solution to an artificial problem.
”The UN Charter begins on the promising opening words: “We the peoples.” However, one will seek in vain for any clause in the document that specifies a means by which ordinary people can play a role in the organization’s deliberations and decision-making.”
Searching in vain for any clause that says ordinary people can play a role in decision making? Is this a good thing? Shouldn’t people have some ability to influence decision making?
”The bodies of the UN and international organizations are occupied by officials who are appointed by the executive branches of national governments. In view of the growing importance of international organizations and their decisions, this is no longer sufficient.”
How so? Do we not want people who are directly chosen by the host nation to be taking part in such discussions?
”A United Nations Parliamentary Assembly (UNPA) for the first time would give popularly elected representatives a formal role in global affairs. As an additional body, the assembly will directly represent the world’s citizens and not governments.”
Logistical question: how do you decide if a leader is ”popularly elected”? Military dictators frequently hold sham elections and win close to 100% of the vote.
Further, what if the values of a block of nations (such as the 50+ members of Islamic nations) democratically overrule nations which believe in human rights?
”Initially, states could choose whether their UNPA members would come from national parliaments, reflecting their political spectrum and gender equality, or whether they would be directly elected. Eventually, the goal is to have all members directly elected.”
If they are not being directly elected by their people, then who is electing them? Should the UN get to decide who ”represents” the Nation of Canada, the US, Australia, or Japan?
”Starting as a largely consultative body, the rights and powers of the UNPA could be expanded over time as its democratic legitimacy increases. The assembly will act as an independent watchdog in the UN system and as a democratic reflection of the diversity of world public opinion.”
Ah, non-binding and consultative bodies which eventually become legally binding? Kind of like the UN Global Migration Compact.
How exactly would there be ”oversight” when this would effectively take away actual representative government from host nations?
”In the long run, once its members are all democratically elected, the assembly could be developed into a world parliament which – under certain conditions and in conjunction with the UN General Assembly – may be able to adopt universally binding regulations
.
In short, the UN should evolve from what many believe to be a generally ineffectual “talk-shop” into a viable democratic and legislative body.”
How would this possibly be democratic? It takes control even further from the public. If you think your MP or MPP or MLA or Senators don’t represent you now, how would you gain more representation from being even further removed.
On behalf of the British Broadcasting Corporation BBC, in 2004/05 the research institute GlobeScan conducted representative surveys in 18 countries representing 61% of the world population.
In one of the questions concerning reforms of the United Nations, participants were asked about their opinion on “creating a new UN Parliament, made up of representatives directly elected by citizens, having powers equal to the current UN General Assembly that is controlled by national governments.”
On average, 63% supported the reform proposal, while only 20% rejected it. For the first time, this survey provides empirical evidence that the world’s citizens overwhelmingly support the establishment of a directly elected world parliament.
Country results
In every surveyed nation the supporters of a UN Parliament significantly outnumbered the opponents. Overall, support to opposition margins show overwhelming majorities in all nations favoring the creation of a UN Parliament.
Let’s see: Only 18 countries were surveyed
UN claims these 18 countries represent 61% of the population.
UN Claims that 63% of populations surveyed support global government 1/ Argentina 2/ Australia 3/ Brazil 4/ Canada 5/ Chile 6/ China 7/ Germany 8/ Great Britain (UK) 9/ India 10/ Indonesia 11/ Italy 12/ Mexico 13/ Phillipines 14/ Poland 15/ Russia 16/ South Korea 17/ Turkey 18/ USA
Assuming the numbers are true, that means that all but 18 countries were left out of the survey
It means that 39% of national populations were not consulted at all
It means that 37% (of consulted nations) oppose the measure.
A better level might be to use (0.63)*(0.61) = .03843 = 38% (A tad silly, but this research is not representative)
Assuming this research is even accurate, that would mean that only 38% would support such a measure. Of course, the site doesn’t list any of the SAMPLE SIZES, which would help give a more accurate picture.
Were 100 people interviewed in each country? 1,000? 10,000? Can we see the questions that were asked?
Of course, none of this addresses the central question: why is it that there has been no public consultation on us signing away our sovereignty? Shouldn’t we have the final say?
Wait, globalists don’t care what people think. Now it makes sense.
4. Globalist Politicians In Canada
Justin Trudeau, and Elizabeth May are on here. Jagmeet Singh probably would be, if he actually was an M.P.
Members of Parliament from Canada Diane Bellemare Senator, economist and politician from Quebec, Canada
(2013-12-17)
Carolyn Bennett MP, Canada (2009-07-07)
Sheri Benson Member of Parliament for Saskatoon West, Canada (2017-03-10)
Daniel Blaikie MP, Canada (2017-03-06)
Rachel Blaney MP, Canada (2016-10-26)
Sean Casey Member of Parliament, Canada (2011-09-01)
François Choquette MP, Canada (2011-06-09)
David Christopherson Member of Parliament, Canada (2011-06-21)
Jane Cordy Senator, Canada (2018-01-19)
Jane Cordy Senator, Canada (2018-01-31)
Nathan Cullen MP, Canada (2010-10-05)
Julie Dabrusin Member of Parliament for Toronto-Danforth, Canada (2017-04-18)
Don Davies MP, elected 2008; Lawyer, trade union representative, Canada (2007-05-25)
Fin Donnelly MP, Canada (2010-04-19)
Julie Dzerowicz MP, Canada (2017-03-16)
Wayne Easter MP, Canada (2012-02-09)
Art Eggleton Canadian Senator, Canada (2009-04-28)
Ali Ehsassi MP, Canada (2017-04-07)
Nathaniel Erskine-Smith Canada (2016-05-12)
Hedy Fry MP, Canada (2009-06-15)
Marc Garneau MP; first Canadian in outer space; President, Canadian Space Agency (2001-2006), Canada (2012-03-24)
Randall Garrison MP, Canada (2012-02-24)
Pamela Goldsmith-Jones MP for West Vancouver-Sunshine Coast-Sea to Sky Country. Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of International Trade, Canada (2017-05-17)
Claude Gravelle Member of Parliament, Nickel Belt, Canada (2010-07-29)
Laurie Hawn Member of Parliament since 2006 Privy Councillor Royal Canadian Air Force Veteran, Canada (2012-02-16)
Carol Hughes MP, Canada (2012-02-16)
Mobina Jaffer Member of the Canadian Senate, representing British Columbia, Canada (2009-12-18)
Janis G. Johnson Senator, Canada (2009-05-01)
Peter Julian MP, Canada (2008-02-25)
Frances Lankin Senator, Canada (2016-11-15)
Dr. Hélène Laverdière Foreign Affairs Critic for the New Democratic Party of Canada and MP for Laurier – Ste-Marie, Canada (2012-02-27)
Dominic LeBlanc MP, Canada (2012-03-01)
Hélène LeBlanc MP, Canada (2012-02-28)
Alistair MacGregor MP, Canada (2018-02-09)
Brian Masse MP, Canada (2009-04-30)
Irene Mathyssen Canada (2012-03-12)
Elizabeth May MP; Leader, Green Party of Canada, Canada
(2007-05-11)
Dr. John McCallum Canada
(2012-03-13)
The Honourable John McKay P.C., M.P. Canadian Member of Parliament for the Riding of Scarborough-Guildwood., Canada
(2012-02-28)
Alexandra Mendes MP, Canada (2009-04-28)
Don Meredith Senator, Canada (2017-03-01)
Maryann Mihychuk Canada (2018-02-14)
Wilfred P. Moore Senator, Canada (2011-06-21)
Isabelle Morin MP, Canada (2012-02-28)
Joyce Murray MP, Canada (2009-05-09)
Thanh Hai Ngo Senator, Canada (2018-01-22)
Robert Oliphant MP, Canada (2009-06-15)
John Oliver Member of Parliament , Canada (2018-03-01)
Joe Peschisolido Canada (2018-02-21)
Rose-May Poirier Senator, Canada (2010-07-02)
Tracey Ramsey MP, Canada (2018-02-08)
Murray Rankin MP, Canada (2018-01-26)
Pablo Rodriguez MP, Canada (2010-05-03)
Dan Ruimy MP, Canada (2018-05-07)
Nancy Ruth Senator, Canada (2009-05-01)
Francis Scarpaleggia MP, Canada (2010-08-19)
Judy Sgro MP; Canadian Member of Parliament for the Riding of York West, Canada (2012-04-05)
Scott Simms MP, Canada (2012-02-28)
Wayne Stetski MP, Canada (2018-04-25)
Dr. Kennedy Stewart MP, Canada (2012-02-22)
Justin Trudeau Member of Parliament, Canada (2010-07-21)
David Wells Senator, Canada (2016-11-22)
Borys Wrzesnewskyj MP, Canada (2009-05-01)
Kate Young MP, Canada (2018-05-03)
5. First UNPA Int’l Meeting in 2007
First international meeting on a UNPA Palais des Nations, Geneva, November 2007 The first international meeting on a UNPA was held in November 2007 at the Palais des Nations in Geneva under the patronage of former UN Secretary-General Boutros Boutros-Ghali and was hosted by the Society for Threatened Peoples International. Parliamentarians, representatives of non-governmental organizations and other activists of the UNPA campaign from 18 countries gathered for an exchange on the UNPA concept and the Campaign strategy. The meeting reiterated the principles laid down in the international appeal for a UNPA such as the gradual approach which allows first steps beneath the threshold of UN Charter reform. It was also stressed, however, that at the same time the eventual goal of a world parliament should be communicated. While some questions were vividly debated, the meeting also concluded, among other things, that a UNPA should be open for participation of regional parliamentary assemblies and should offer innovative ways for strong NGO participation. Read more
Conclusions regarding policies of the Campaign for a UN Parliamentary Assembly At its meeting on 19-20 November 2007 in the “Palais des Nations” in Geneva, the Campaign for the Establishment of a United Nations Parliamentary Assembly (UNPA) has reiterated the policies laid down in the “Appeal for the Establishment for a Parliamentary Assembly at the United Nations” and notes in particular that: -the Campaign pursues a politically pragmatic and gradual approach to achieve the eventual long-term goal of a world parliament; -in a first step the Campaign advocates the establishment of a UNPA by means which do not require a change of the UN Charter; -the Campaign’s appeal states that a consultative UNPA initially could be composed of national parliamentarians and that this statement does not exclude the option to advocate the participation of other entities. For example, the Campaign also advocates the participation of regional parliamentary assemblies in a UNPA, such as the European Parliament and the Pan-African Parliament, and consideration may be given for the inclusion of local authorities in the consultative UNPA ; -the aforementioned statement also does not exclude to advocate a flexible approach to the mode of elections. The Campaign supports the approach that already in the first step the UNPA’s Statutes should allow the participating states to opt for direct elections of their delegates if they wish to do so; -the Campaign advocates a UNPA which is inclusive and open to all UN member states. However, direct elections of the UNPA’s delegates are regarded as a precondition for vesting the body with legislative rights. the Campaign policy clearly embraces the demand that a UNPA has to provide for strong and efficient ways to include civil society, in particular NGOs, and local administrations into its work; -the Campaign’s policy pursues the goal that the UNPA, once established, would advocate and facilitate a reform of the present system of international institutions and global governance; -the Campaign understands that whereas the appeal refers to “the UN and the organizations of the UN system,” that this could be interpreted to include the Bretton Woods Institutions.
Some takeaways from this: (a) Yes, this is about a world government (b) Changes to UN Charter may not be needed (c) NGO/Civil Societies to be given roles to work
6. Second UNPA Int’l Meeting in 2008
Second international meeting on a UNPA European Parliament, Brussels, November 2008 The second international meeting on a UNPA was held on November 4-5, 2008, at the European Parliament in Brussels and was hosted by European deputy Jo Leinen.
Representatives of non-governmental organizations and stakeholders of the UNPA campaign from around 15 countries gathered for an exchange on the campaign’s progress within the past year, an outlook onto the coming activities and to discuss political questions. The meeting included a Round Table consultation and an evening reception with invited guests. In a welcome message published on the occasion of the meeting, the President of the European Parliament affirmed the parliament’s support for a UNPA.
One of the conclusions reached at the meeting was that a UNPA would be complementary to the Inter-Parliamentary Union’s work. Read more The establishment of a United Nations Parliamentary Assembly and the Inter-Parliamentary Union
The establishment of a United Nations Parliamentary Assembly and the Inter-Parliamentary Union At its meeting on 4-5 November 2008 in the European Parliament in Brussels, the Campaign for the Establishment of a United Nations Parliamentary Assembly (UNPA) deliberated on the relation between the proposed UNPA and the Inter-Parliamentary Union (IPU) and the possible roles and functions of the two parliamentary bodies. The Campaign concluded that the proposed UNPA and the IPU would be complementary institutions. A UNPA would not replace or duplicate the IPU’s functions. Quite the contrary, a UNPA would provide a response to the democratic deficit in global governance which the IPU in its current structure is unable to offer.
The Campaign noted in particular: (1) The IPU is an association of national parliaments. One of its activities is to provide for a “parliamentary dimension to international cooperation”. The IPU’s goal in this context is to strengthen the ability of national parliaments to exercise their oversight functions at the national level in matters of international nature. The Campaign underlines the importance of this dimension. (2) The purpose of a UNPA is to exercise parliamentary functions directly at the international level in its own right. One of the goals is to make the UN executives and its institutions accountable to a global parliamentary body. The IPU has no such capacity and currently also does not aspire to develop such an oversight function. (3) The IPU’s purpose is to be a facilitator for the work of national parliaments. In contrast, a UNPA would be composed of individual parliamentarians who would be called upon to take a global view. (4) The precedent of the Pan-African Parliament and the African Parliamentary Union shows that the UNPA and the IPU need not be mutually exclusive. (5) In the long run, a UNPA could be composed of directly elected members. The precedent of the European Parliament and the Conference of Community and European Affairs Committees of Parliaments of the European Union shows that a largely directly elected UNPA and the IPU would be complementary and indeed both necessary. (6) The Campaign supports the work of the IPU and appreciates any and all active contributions from the IPU and IPU members in the efforts for the establishment of a UNPA.
7. Third UNPA Int’l Meeting in 2009
Third international meeting on a UNPA New York, October 2009 The third international meeting on a UNPA was held in October 2009 across the United Nations headquarters in New York. Around 60 participants from 19 countries, among them 12 Members of Parliament and numerous representatives of non-governmental organizations who are part of the Campaign for a UN Parliamentary Assembly attended the event in order to exchange experiences and views. Participants in the meeting generally felt that the campaign has gathered considerable political momentum over the past two and a half years since its launch in April 2007.
Establishment of a global parliament discussed at international meeting in New York 30. October 2009 The progress of the international efforts for the establishment of a global parliamentary assembly was discussed at a meeting across the United Nations headquarters in New York. Around 60 participants from 19 countries, among them 12 Members of Parliament and numerous representatives of non-governmental organizations who are part of the Campaign for the Establishment of a United Nations Parliamentary Assembly (UNPA) attended the event on Monday in order to exchange their different experiences and views. . In her welcome remarks Senator Sonia Escudero, Secretary-General of the Latin-American Parliament, pointed out that the United Nations, established in 1945, “reproduces an age old international order.” Said Senator Escudero: “One of the challenges that the United Nations will have to face in order not to become obsolete is its own reform. It is imperative to undertake an integral reform of the United Nations taking into account that any representative institution, that is to say democratic institution, should have an structure that honours this characteristic. It is clear that the establishment of a UN Parliamentary Assembly would be a decisive step towards the democratic consolidation in the United Nations system.” . Jo Leinen, Member of the European Parliament, stressed the long-standing support of the European Parliament for the creation of a UNPA. The most recent resolution was adopted in June 2005. Mr Leinen noted that a new effort to reiterate the parliament’s support will be taken in the current new legislature. A representative of the Argentine Chamber of Deputies, Fernando Iglesias, reported on a resolution calling for a UNPA adopted by his parliament in August this year. Mr Iglesias promoted that the participants in the campaign reach out intensively to civil society and the academic world as well in order to build a broader base of public awareness. This approach was endorsed by Mike Sebalu, Member of the East African Legislative Assembly, saying that “it is crucial to reach critical mass of supporters from all walks of life.” . Presenting a report adopted by the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe (PACE) on the reform of the United Nations a few weeks ago, Andreas Gross, a Swiss Member of Parliament and leader of the Socialist Group in PACE, pointed out that the modernization of the UN should include by necessity a parliamentary dimension. Giving the example of the Council of Europe, Gross stressed that the UN runs the risk of becoming irrelevant in the long-term if no Parliamentary Assembly is established. “If the Council of Europe were a government organization alone, without a parliamentary body, its importance would have diminished completely by now,” Gross said. . The afternoon session concentrated, among other things, on a debate on the concept of a UN Parliamentary Assembly and, more in particular, models for the possible distribution of seats in a UNPA. The Chair of the Committee for a Democratic U.N., Andreas Bummel, presented a paper on the subject. He outlined that the report shows the feasibility of the proposal and that there are realistic and pragmatic options on the table. Joseph Schwartzberg, Professor emeritus of the University of Minnesota, presented his own incremental approach for the creation of a UNPA and elaborated on his suggestion to distribute seats according to population, equality, and share in UN membership dues. Andrew Strauss, Professor of Law at the Widener University School of Law, argued that a UNPA should be established through a stand-alone treaty rather than as a subsidiary body of the UN General Assembly. . Participants in the meeting generally felt that the campaign has gathered considerable political momentum over the past two and a half years since its launch in April 2007. The event was filmed by a crew led by Lisa Russell who recently won an Emmy Award and works on a documentary on U.S.-UN relations.
Okay, this is getting to be much more than theoretical. There are actual discussions on how the seats should be distributed should this Parliament ever become a reality.
8. Fourth UNPA Int’l Meeting in 2010
Declaration calls for intergovernmental conference on UN Parliament . 5. October 2010 . An international meeting of the Campaign for the Establishment of a United Nations Parliamentary Assembly in the Senate of Argentina in Buenos Aires has called on the United Nations and its member states to initiate a “preparatory process towards an intergovernmental conference for the purpose of establishing a Parliamentary Assembly at the United Nations.“ A declaration adopted by around 50 participants from 20 countries, among them ten Members of Parliament and representatives of 20 civil society organizations, states that “the need to democratize global governance is one of the greatest political challenges of our times. It calls on individual world citizens, and especially parliamentarians, governments, the international donor community, and civil society to make a commitment to democratic global change.” . At the opening session the Argentinian deputy Fernando Iglesias reiterated the need for global democratization through a UN Parliamentary Assembly. As a guest speaker Olivier Giscard d’Estaing, former Member of Parliament from France, voiced his disappointment over the enduring failure to bring about any substantial reform of the United Nations. Mr. Giscard d’Estaing called for the creation of “new world institutions dealing with world problems, including a world parliament.” The Executive Director of the World Federalist Movement-Institute for Global Policy, William Pace, severely criticized the G8 and G20. “These informal governance mechanism have failed dramatically,” Mr. Pace stated. “Our goal is to replace the brutality of imperialism with constitutional and parliamentary principles at the global level,” he said. . In a written welcome note to the meeting, the parliamentarian and former Prime Minister of Malta, Alfred Sant, stated that “the goal of establishing a UN Parliamentary Assembly may appear to be far away down the road, but global realities are changing so fast that the relevance of an Assembly may become salient much sooner than is now supposed.” The European parliamentarian Jo Leinen noted in a message that “the proposal now has to be taken up by a group of like-minded governments”. . In the plenary session, participants deliberated on the outcome document and on their activities in the previous year. In the afternoon, parallel workshops were held. The former clerk of the Pan-African Parliament, Werunga Murumba, now at the Centre for Parliamentary Studies and Training of the Kenya National Assembly, spoke about lessons learned from the creation of existing international parliamentary assemblies. Other workshops were held on the next steps in the Latin-American region and on the creation of a UN Parliamentary Assembly and UN Charter reform. . The event that was held in the premises of the Senate of Argentina on Monday was the fourth meeting of an international campaign that was launched in April 2007. The head of the Campaign’s Secretariat, Andreas Bummel, noted that in this time span around 900 Members of Parliament from over 90 countries expressed their support, representing over 100 million people from their constituencies. Around 750 are currently in office. . The meeting was preceded by a seminar of the Latin-American Parliament on regional integration and the reform of international institutions that was held in the previous week. One of the sessions was devoted to the proposal of a UN Parliamentary Assembly. The UNPA-Campaign meeting was part of a ten-day programme in Buenos Aires coordinated by the Argentinian non-governmental organization Democracia Global.
Again, more talks about how the logistics of such a proposal would work. Not a question of whether we should be doing this, or what the public might say. Rather, we agree, now let’s talk details.
9. Fifth UNPA Int’l Meeting in 2013
Fifth international meeting on a UNPA European Parliament, Brussels, October 2013 The fifth international meeting on a UNPA was held on 15-16 October 2013 in the European Parliament in Brussels and was hosted by the Members of the European Parliament Elmar Brok, Jo Leinen, Isabella Lövin, and Graham Watson from the four largest political groups European People’s Party EPP, Socialists and Democrats S&D, the Greens, and the liberal ALDE group respectively. In a final declaration, participants from around thirty countries unanimously expressed concern that “no adequate measures have been taken to address the democratic deficit of global governance in general and of the United Nations in particular.” The conference suggested that “a global democratic body of elected representatives” should be established “to bring global governance in the pursuit of post-2015 development goals” closer to the world’s citizens.
Post-2015 Agenda should include elected UN Assembly to strengthen democratic participation 22. October 2013 5th International Meeting of the Campaign for a UN Parliamentary Assembly concludes with declaration / Strong support from key Members of the European Parliament The fifth international conference on a United Nations Parliamentary Assembly held in the European Parliament in Brussels on 16th and 17th October called on the United Nations and the international community to make democratic participation a key.
One of the conference panels Image: European Parliament element of the Post-2015 Development Agenda. In a final declaration, participants from around thirty countries unanimously expressed concern that “no adequate measures have been taken to address the democratic deficit of global governance in general and of the United Nations in particular.” The conference suggested that “a global democratic body of elected representatives” should be established “to bring global governance in the pursuit of post-2015 development goals” closer to the world’s citizens.
Conference hosted in the European Parliament The conference was hosted by the Members of the European Parliament Elmar Brok, Jo Leinen, Isabella Lövin, and Graham Watson from the four largest political groups European People’s Party EPP, Socialists and Democrats S&D, the Greens, and the liberal ALDE group respectively. At the opening of the conference, Elmar Brok who serves as chairman of the European Parliament’s Commission on Foreign Affairs stated that a consultative UN Parliamentary Assembly would “allow world civil society to be directly associated in the global decision-making process.”
Jo Leinen who is a co-chair of the advisory board of the international campaign for a UN Parliamentary Assembly emphasized that until now no formal body exists that would give citizen-elected representatives a say in global governance. At best they had an observer status. “This is not acceptable,” said Mr Leinen. “In a democratic system, the representatives of the citizens are not observers of what the governments do. They should provide oversight and hold the government executives accountable.” At a panel discussion Isabella Lövin used the example of the global fishery policy to show that the system of international governance is dysfunctional. “It’s still governed by 16th century principles,” she said. Graham Watson pointed out that “there will be times when national interests and global interests collide. A UN Parliamentary Assembly could act as an arbiter and ensure that the voice of the world’s citizens is heard.“
In a message issued on the occasion of the conference, the President of the European Parliament, Martin Schulz, emphasized the longstanding support for the proposal by the European Parliament. In addition, he declared that “The European Parliament may serve as a model for how a UN Parliamentary Assembly could develop over time. What once began as an advisory body composed of national parliamentarians is a directly elected legislature today.”
Consultation with the UN’s Independent Expert A similar position was taken by the UN’s Independent Expert on the Promotion of a Democratic and Equitable International Order, Alfred de Zayas, who was participating as a special guest. In a statement delivered at a special consultation, he confirmed that “Participation is a hallmark of democratic governance” and that “civil society is entitled to more space.” He said that the establishment of a World Parliamentary Assembly was “a promising avenue” to achieve this and could be modelled according to the example of the European Parliament. Mr de Zayas pointed out that his upcoming report to the UN General Assembly includes the recommendation that it “may consider convening a conference to discuss promising initiatives such as the creation of a World Parliamentary Assembly.” In a comment following the statement by Mr de Zayas, the Member of the European Parliament and chairperson of Democracy International, Gerald Häfner, said that “We cannot leave the world to decision-making that is in the interest of big money or big powers – but not in the interest of the world’s citizens. A UN Parliamentary Assembly is a first step to establish global democracy.”
The final declaration adopted by the conference welcomes “the decision of the UN’s Human Rights Council to mandate an Independent Expert on the Promotion of a Democratic and Equitable International Order,” and encourages the Independent Expert “to keep considering the question of a UNPA and in particular to examine possible processes towards its creation.” . Main points of the final declaration In the discussion the Secretary-General of the campaign for a UN Parliamentary Assembly, Andreas Bummel, emphasized three elements in the final declaration: That it puts the proposal for a UN Parliamentary
Gathering in front of the European Parliament Image: CEUNPA Assembly in the context of the Post-2015 Development Agenda, that it highlights the possibility of having a UN Parliamentary Assembly act as a “network of networks” and finally that the document says that “innovative forms of civic participation” in a UNPA through models of electronic democracy could be considered. In its last session, the conference also deliberated on a possible roadmap towards a UN Parliamentary Assembly as well as on the campaign’s goals and strategy. Other speakers at the conference included, among others, Andrew Strauss from Widener University School of Law in the United States, the UN’s representative in Brussels, Antonio Vigilante, the Member of the European Parliament and President of the Union of European Federalists Andrew Duff, the European Parliament’s Vice-President Anni Podimata, Swiss parliamentarian Daniel Jositsch as well as Juan Behrend as representative of the Global Greens Coordination, Gregory Engels as representative of Pirate Parties International, and Hanno Schedler of the Society for Threatened Peoples.
Week of Action for a World Parliament The conference was also a kick-off event for the Global Week of Action for a World Parliament that takes place until UN day on 24 October. At the end of the conference participants gathered in front of the European Parliament at Place du Luxembourg in Brussels and displayed the week’s slogan, “World Parliament Now!”
Okay, the United Human Rights Council will have a say in matters here. Considering the members on it, that is not at all encouraging.
Some alleged “research” is presented elsewhere on the website, claiming that there is widespread support across nations for a global government. Seems rather self serving.
10. Duplicity Of “Populist” Maxime Bernier
This wasn’t in the original version, but worth pointing out to the readers.
Maxime Bernier, a self-identified “populist” left the Conservative Party of Canada in August 2018 and started the People’s Party of Canada. Despite its Communist sounding name, it is marketed as a nationalist/populist party.
The problem is that Bernier was Foreign Affairs Minister in 2007, when this issue was being discussed. Very unethical to remain silent for 12 years, and now claim to oppose it.
While this petition seems to be a welcome change, it cannot be taken at face value. Bernier introduces a petition to prevent Canada from joining any such organization, despite his Committee earlier endorsing it.
The USMCA Treaty is an illegitimate construct to be wielded upon the people by imposing a tyrannical global government. This systemic disease began in the early 1900s with the establishment of the Social Security Administration and the Federal Reserve under the seemingly auspicious authority of Franklin Delano Roosevelt and Senator Aldrich, when our gold and silver in excess of $10,000 was (by executive order 6102 mediated by Proclamation 2039 and enforced by Section 5(b) of the Act of October 6, 1917 (40 Stat. L. 411) mandated to be turned over to the Federal Government (1).
This targeted U.S. citizens as enemies under the War Powers Act and penalized those who refused to hand in their private property with a 10-year sentence in a federal prison and a $10,000 fine (2). And all of this had been done in the name of fighting off the Great Depression. Under the War Powers Act, Congress delegated its power to the president by decree and Roosevelt stole our wealth, laying the groundwork for the development and integration of an international banking network operating outside of the United States, the Bank of International Settlements, with it’s hub originating in New York (3).
People with economic and political interest such as Owen D. Young, J. Pierpont Morgan, Thomas W. Lamont, S. Parker Gilbert, Gates W. McGarrah, and Jackson Reynolds, in conjunction with the Federal Reserve Bank of New York and financed by FDR, sought to extend the principle of central bank cooperation to the international sphere. This has all blown up into the beast we have today, governmental and economic integration into a system of world development which began with the Federal Reserve Act of 1913 (4).
The real and true purpose for the confiscation of our private property and for the circulation of fiat monies is: first to create human capital chattel that is incapacitated by economic debt through inflation; second, to increase the circulation of currency as a means to cause inflation; third, to usurp the people’s authority over government; and to expand the financial sector of federalized government to secure welfare-state programs.
The precursor to these events began to take form under Lincoln’s presidency with the passing of the Legal Tender Act by Congress, allowing gold and silver to be pulled from the U.S. Treasury thereby putting our Union government into debt by purchasing the manufacture and munitions of Union-funded arms makers (5). This act allowed Congress to create a national banking network that printed promissory notes which were given as a receipt promising interest in exchange to those who had invested in bonds. In Hepburn Vs. Griswald, the Supreme Court specifically made United States legal tender notes unconstitutional, illegally ascribing the president the executive privilege under “war powers” to create an artificial currency which no longer had to be backed with a metal of intrinsic value. Knox Vs. Lee struck down Hepburn Vs. Griswald (6), of which the Court held that making paper money legal tender through the Legal Tender Act did not conflict with Article One of the United States Constitution even though our constitution states that there is no legal tender than that of gold and silver.
With the authorization of the President’s signature and through outside influence of the Senate by the Council of Foreign Relations (7), we have been induced into giving up even more of our liberties to a faction within America, Britain, and Europe! A faction which is fabricating events to shift sovereignty from the national interest of the people to an oligarchy operating out of the Hague, the Bank of International Settlements (8), and the Council of Foreign Relations. It also involves the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development, the World bank, World Health Organization, USAID, IrishAid, and many others operating from the headquarters of the United Nations, and who fund NGOs and social programs holding no interest in the States within which they operate. God help us all!
These organizations are helping to dissolve National Sovereignty and Constitutional limitations of our National Government; these same organizations are using monies given through the International Monetary Fund to implement false flag events, through H.E.A.T. programs in conjunction with Civicus (9) and Certified Social Enterprises using USAID, to facilitate entry by open border programs with an entirely new population of citizens! This will in turn distort our judicial foundations by using the Supreme Court as their tool to reform Constitutional laws into enforcing its “Color of Law” through activism, in which Congress (Legislators) is expecting the Judiciary to uphold laws that are not Constitutional!
In Article Eight of the Preamble to the USMCA we are told this document will (10): (Note: comments have been italicized)
“RECOGNIZE their (the World Trade Organization, orWTO, is the arbiter of the contract and is keeper of the Contract) inherent right to regulate and resolve to preserve the flexibility of the Parties to set legislative and regulatory priorities (this agreement mandates legislative changes in the respective nations for ratification which supersede a nations Sovereign or Constitutional Law), in a manner consistent with this Agreement, and protect legitimate public welfare objectives (social projects, such as housing and free medical), such as public health, safety, the environment (through associated organizations as the World Health Organization, Strong Cities Network, and ILO) the conservation of living or non-living exhaustible natural resources (the International Monetary Fund considers people to be human capital), the integrity and stability of the financial system and public morals (is the First Amendment being disregarded here and we are no longer naturally allowed to have freedom of conscience?), in accordance with the rights and obligations provided in this Agreement;
And in Article Thirteen of this Preamble:
“PROMOTE high levels of environmental protection, including through effective enforcement by each Party of its environmental laws, as well as through enhanced environmental cooperation, and further the aims of sustainable development, including through mutually supportive trade and environmental policies and practices;”
The wording here seems less favorable to environmental agencies, and “enhanced environmental cooperation” and “sustainable development” implies Carbon schemes, Cap-and-Trade, and Carbon tax. Will manufacturers be mandated to regulate emissions, taxing us by means of Congress for fossil fuel consumption?
–
Article 1.2: Relation to Other Agreements
“Each Party
affirms its existing rights and obligations with respect to each
other under the WTO Agreement and other agreements to which it and
another Party are party.”
–
Art. 2.4.7
1. Unless otherwise provided in this Agreement, no Party shall increase any existing customs duty, or adopt any new customs duty, on an originating good.
2. Unless otherwise provided in this Agreement, each Party shall apply a customs duty on an originating good in accordance with its Schedule to Annex 2-B (Tariff Commitments).
The Treaty divests Congress of the power to unilaterally determine our tariffs. The Treaty violates the following provisions of our Constitution:
At Art. I, §1, We vested in Congress, all legislative Powers granted by our Constitution.
At Art. I, §8, We granted to Congress the powers
Clause 1: To lay and collect Imposts (import tariffs)
Clause 3: To regulate Commerce with foreign Nations
Clause 5: To coin Money and regulate the Value thereof
Clause 8: To issue Patents and Copyrights
Art. I, §8, cl. 1 – to “lay and collect Imposts”
At Art. I, §9, cl. 1: Commencing January 1, 1808, We granted to Congress the power to control Migration to the United States.
At Art. II, §2, cl. 2, We granted to the President the power to make Treaties, provided two thirds of the Senators present concur.
At Art. III, §2, cl. 1, We declared that the judicial Power of the United States shall extend to all Cases arising under Treaties made under the Authority of the United States to Controversies to which the United States shall be a Party
At Art. IV, §4, We imposed upon the United States the duties to: guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government; and protect each of the States against Invasion.
At Art. VI, cl. 2, We declared that our Constitution, and Acts of Congress and Treaties authorized by the Constitution, is the “supreme Law of the Land.”
In the 10th Amendment, We declared that powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution are reserved to the States or to the people.
–
Article 1606.2Has a clause that is disconcerting
(c) the waiving of labor certification tests or procedures of similar effect for spouses of business persons who have been granted temporary entry for more than one year under Section B, C or D of Annex 1603;
(d) proposed modifications of or additions to this Chapter (this could be opened up to include all family members piggybacking into America, as with under Obama. In Canada this legislation has already been passed by both the Harper and Trudeau government and applies to foreign students and foreign workers.)
–
Article 23.12.5
(i) promotion of equality and elimination of employment discrimination in the areas of age, disability, race, ethnicity, religion (will employers have to conform to Islamic prayer schedules?), sexual orientation, gender identity (People of religious faith, specifically Christian, must now render services that conflict with conscience?) and other characteristics not related to merit or the requirements of employment; and,
–
Article 20.2
The protection and enforcement of intellectual property rights should contribute to the promotion of technological innovation and to the transfer and dissemination of technology, to the mutual advantage of producers and users of technological knowledge and in a manner conducive to social and economic welfare, and to a balance of rights and obligations. (This treaty subordinates property rights to the collective.)
Article 20.3
1. A Party may, in formulating or amending its laws and regulations, adopt measures necessary to protect public health and nutrition, and to promote the public interest in sectors of vital importance to their socio-economic and technological development, provided that such measures are consistent with the provisions of this Chapter.
2. Appropriate measures, provided that they are consistent with the provisions of this Chapter, may be needed to prevent the abuse of intellectual property rights by right holders or the resort to practices which unreasonably restrain trade or adversely affect the international transfer of technology. (If intellectual property is a barrier to trade, this is establishing global governmental control over intellectual property and taking it for the advantage of the collective if it poses a “barrier to trade”)
–
Article 20.7
Each Party affirms that it has ratified or acceded to the following agreements: (a) Patent Cooperation Treaty, as amended September 28, 1979;(b)Paris Convention; (c)Berne Convention; (e)WCT; and (f)WPPT.
Each Party shall ratify or accede to each of the following agreements, if it is not already a party to that agreement, by the date of entry into force of this Agreement: (a)Madrid Protocol; (b)Budapest Treaty; (c)Singapore Treaty;1
1 A Party may satisfy the obligations in paragraph 2(a) and 2(c) by ratifying or acceding to either the Madrid Protocol or the Singapore Treaty. (d)UPOV 1991; (e)Hague Agreement; and (f)Brussels Convention.
The Parties shall
give due consideration to ratifying or acceding to the Patent Law
Treaty, done at Geneva June 1, 2000; or, in the alternative, shall
adopt or maintain procedural standards consistent with the objective
of the Patent Law Treaty.”
Article 20.7 requires the Parties to ratify or accede to a long list of international “agreements” including the World International Property Organization’s (WIPO) Patent Law Treaty. The WIPO is an agency of the United Nationsand adheres to international laws.
–
Article 24.9.5
For greater certainty, for each Party, this provision pertains to ozone- depleting substances controlled by the Montreal Protocol (EPA and United Nations) on Substances that Deplete the Ozone Layer, done at Montreal, September 16, 1987 (Montreal Protocol), and any existing and future amendments to the Montreal Protocol to which the Parties are parties.
6. A Party shall be deemed in compliance with this provision if it maintains the measure or measures listed in Annex 24-A implementing its obligations under the Montreal Protocol (giving the World Bank a direct interest) or any subsequent measure or measures that provide an equivalent or higher level of environmental protection as the measure or measures listed (11).
–
We will see more regulation and higher licensing fees.
Paul Larkin Jr, of The Heritage Foundation.- “licensing regimes prohibit individuals, sometimes on pain of criminal liability, from engaging in conduct that poses no risk of harm to any person or to the community. Such a regime causes injury rather than protecting against it.”
Article 24.17:Marine Wild Capture Fisheries11
1. The Parties acknowledge their role as major consumers, producers and traders of fisheries products and the importance of the marine fisheries sectors to their development and to the livelihoods of fishing communities, including those engaged in artisan, small scale, and indigenous fisheries. The Parties also recognize the need for individual and collective action within international fora to address the urgent resource problems resulting from over fishing and unsustainable utilization of fisheries resources.
2. Accordingly, the Parties recognize the importance of taking measures aimed at the conservation and the sustainable management of fisheries and the contribution of those measures to providing environmental, economic and social opportunities for present and future generations. The Parties also recognize the importance of promoting and facilitating trade in sustainable managed and legally harvested fish and fish products, while ensuring that trade in these products is not subject to unnecessary or unjustifiable barriers to trade, given the negative effect that such barriers can have on the well-being of their communities who depend upon the fishing industry for their livelihood.”
Article 24.18: Sustainable Fisheries Management
13. Each Party shall base its fisheries management system on the best scientific evidence available and on internationally recognized best practices for fisheries management and conservation as reflected in the relevant provisions of international instruments aimed at ensuring the sustainable use and conservation of marine species.13
14. These instruments include, among others, and as they may apply, United Nations Convention on Law of the Sea (UNCLOS)
Promote Compliance with
International Conservation and Management Measures by Fishing
Vessels on the High Seas (Compliance Agreement), done at Rome,
November 24, 1993, the 2001 FAO International Plan of Action to
Prevent, Deter, and Eliminate Illegal, Unreported, and Unregulated
(IUU Fishing), and the 2009
Agreement on Port State Measures to Prevent, Deter, and Eliminate IUU Fishing.” (Our taxes go to fund these type of programs.(12))
–
Article 33.1: Definitions
For the purposes of this Chapter:
Article IV Staff Report means the report prepared by a staff team of the International Monetary Fund (IMF) for consideration by the Executive Board of the IMF in the context of a country’s adherence to Article IV, Section 3(b), of the IMF Articles of Agreement;
The Treaty surrenders the United States’ Canada’s and Mexico’s power over money and their economy to the IMF. Section 3 provides that the IMF shall oversee the compliance of each member with its obligations under Section 1 of Article IV.
Section 1 requires each member to “direct its economic and financial policies toward the objective of fostering orderly economic growth with reasonable price stability,” and to foster “orderly underlying economic and financial conditions and a monetary system that does not tend to produce erratic disruptions” (i.e., our economy is to be planned by the IMF)
Article IV, §3 (b) of the IMF Articles of Agreement, states that the IMF “shall exercise firm surveillance over the exchange rate policies of members,” and “shall adopt specific principles for the guidance of all members with respect to those policies.”USMCA Art. 33.4 confirms that the three Countries are “bound under the IMF Articles of Agreement to avoid manipulating exchange rates or the international monetary system”
–
Article 16.2
3. Nothing in this Agreement prevents a Party from applying measures to regulate the entry of natural persons of another Party into, or their temporary stay in, its territory, including those measures necessary to protect the integrity of, and to ensure the orderly movement of natural persons across, its borders, provided that those measures are not applied in a manner as to nullify or impair the benefits accruing to any Party under this Chapter.” (It may allow open borders to a respective member if international businesses require workers from another country, which will undermine regulations in place regarding labour costs and could result in large labour movements from Mexico to both Canada and the United States)
Article 16.8
Except for this Chapter, Chapter 1 (Initial Provisions and General Definitions), Chapter 30 (Administrative and Institutional Provisions), Chapter 31 (Dispute Settlement), Chapter 34 (Final Provisions), Article 29.2 (Publication), and Article 29.3 (Administrative Proceedings), this Agreement does not impose an obligation on a Party regarding its immigration measures.
–
Article 23.1 cites the International Labor Organization’s (ILO) “Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work” (1998), as guiding the treatment of labor issues under the Treaty. The ILO is an agency of the United Nations (UN); and part of the ILO’s “social justice” agenda is to formulate “fair migration schemes in regional integration processes”.
The United Nations will dictate immigration policy for the “regional integration” of Canada, Mexico, and the United States.
For more detailed information pertaining to how the USMCA usurps the national sovereignty of the governmental parties involved, please direct your attention to an article written by Publius Huldah (13).
In Federalist No. 22, Alexander Hamilton said that one of the problems with the Articles of Confederation, our first Constitution, was that it was never ratified by the people. Because the only foundation was the consent of state legislatures, questions arose concerning its validity. This is why Article VII of our second and current Constitution provides for its ratification by Conventions held in each of the States. In support of the ratification method set forth in Article VII, Hamilton wrote:
“…The fabric of American empire ought to rest on the solid basis of THE CONSENT OF THE PEOPLE. The streams of national power ought to flow immediately from that pure, original fountain of all legitimate authority.”
Our Constitution begins with, “WE THE PEOPLE.” Because we consented to it.
Publius Huldah states: “the USMCA Treaty sets up global government over the economic issues covered by the Treaty. It is NOT to be submitted to THE PEOPLE for their consent. The globalists who infest our Legislative and Executive Branches (the latter of which, as the Perloff article points out, has been dominated by the Council on Foreign Relations for over 70 years) want the Treaty ratified by a simple majority vote in Congress.”
*Editor’s note* Trump heralding the USMCA as a huge win, but who is it a win for?(ref) I have supported Trump for a long time, but I won’t let bullshit slide. If he fucks up, he needs to be called on it.(ref)
Secondly, I am trying to find out who wrote the damn thing. I believe Munchin, Ross, Kushner for the USA. Harper, Mulroney and Freeland(Soros). Known globalists. “Trudeau has, in fact, poured extraordinary effort into the file. He brought Brian Mulroney—political lion in winter and the Conservative architect of the original deal—in to brief the Liberal cabinet. Trudeau appointed a NAFTA council that included not just prominent Tories and New Democrats, but also top union and farming voices, along with the expected business leaders from banking, auto parts, entertainment, high tech and more.”(ref)
This is the document that Trump is touting as a major vicotry. He’s seems just along for the ride, like a political used car salesman. I am truly disgusted and expect him to fight harder.
Yellow Vests of Canada 